A remark on problem about trajectory of a projectile in the atmosphere

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter wrobel
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the trajectory of a projectile in the atmosphere, emphasizing the presence of a vertical asymptote derived from stability theory. The equations of motion are defined using Newton's second law, leading to a stable equilibrium where the projectile's vertical velocity approaches a constant value, denoted as ##v^* = -\sqrt{mg/\gamma}##. The analysis reveals that the projectile's horizontal velocity, ##v_x##, approaches zero over time, confirming that the system's solutions remain bounded for all time, thus preventing indefinite increase or decrease in velocity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's second law of motion
  • Familiarity with stability theory in dynamical systems
  • Knowledge of atmospheric drag models
  • Basic calculus for differential equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of stability theory in dynamical systems
  • Explore different atmospheric drag models beyond the quadratic model
  • Learn about the eigenvalues of linearized systems and their significance
  • Investigate the mathematical derivation of projectile motion under varying forces
USEFUL FOR

Physics educators, students studying dynamics, engineers involved in projectile design, and anyone interested in the mathematical modeling of motion in fluid environments.

wrobel
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
1,243
Reaction score
1,051
This is just to share some teaching experience.
A problem about trajectory of a projectile in the atmosphere is very well known. The trajectory has a vertical asymptote. This fact is easy to obtain by using the stability theory.

Consider equations of motion. Let ##\boldsymbol v=v_x\boldsymbol e_x+v_y\boldsymbol e_y## be the velocity of the projectile relative the standard Earth fixed frame ##xy## with ##y## directed upwards.
The second Newton
##m\boldsymbol {\dot v}=m\boldsymbol g-\gamma |\boldsymbol v|\boldsymbol v;##
implies
##m\dot v_x=-\gamma v_x\sqrt{v_x^2+v_y^2},\quad \gamma=const>0,##
##m\dot v_y=-mg-\gamma v_y \sqrt{v_x^2+v_y^2}.##
This system has an equilibrium: ##v_x=0,\quad v_y=v^*:=-\sqrt{mg/\gamma}.##
This equilibrium is exponentially stable: eigenvalues of linearized system around this equilibrium are both negative so that
##v_x=O(e^{-c_x t}),\quad v_y=v^*+O(e^{-c_yt}),\quad c_x,c_y>0,\quad t\to\infty;##
and
##x(t)=x_0+\int_0^tv_xd\tau\to const,\quad y(t)\sim v^*t.##
Besides the quadratic model of atmosphere drag there are a lot of other models where the stability theory works but an explicit integration is impossible
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Why does the projectile’s velocity approach a constant value instead of increasing or decreasing indefinitely?
 
Each solution is bounded for ##t\ge 0##. This follows from the estimate
$$\frac{m}{2}\frac{d}{dt}|\boldsymbol v|^2=m(\boldsymbol g,\boldsymbol v)-\gamma|\boldsymbol v|^3\le m|\boldsymbol g||\boldsymbol v|-\gamma|\boldsymbol v|^3.$$
From the first equation we have
$$v_x(t)=v_x(0)e^{-\frac{\gamma}{m}\int_0^t|\boldsymbol v|d\tau}.$$
Thus ##v_x\to 0## as ##t\to \infty## and the
##\omega##-limit set of any solution belongs to the line ##\{v_x=0\}##. Only the set ##\{v_x=0,\quad v_y=v^*\}## is an invariant set that this line contains.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Greg Bernhardt

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K