A Reverse Dynamo - Opposite to the Shake Flashlight

  • Thread starter Thread starter Smeezer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dynamo Reverse
AI Thread Summary
A reverse dynamo, or linear generator, can theoretically be designed to move a magnet or coil vertically using alternating current (AC), which could reduce vibrations in tattoo machines and help prevent repetitive strain injuries. This concept is similar to electric bell circuits, but practical implementation requires careful consideration of size, energy efficiency, and the specific movements needed for tattooing. Key factors include the torque and speed of the vertical motion, as well as the power source's compactness and efficiency. Researching electromagnetism principles and linear generator designs may provide valuable insights. Overall, while promising, developing a reverse dynamo for tattoo machines necessitates further exploration and refinement.
Smeezer
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I would like to know if it's possible to build a dynamo that instead of having an electrical current driven through a coil by movement of a magnet to generate electricity could be driven by ac to move the magnet or coil in a vertical motion instead. If so, (which logically it sounds possible to me), could it be made small enough with low enough energy requirements and take up small enough space to be practical to drive a tattoo needle in a tattoo machine? I'll be the first to admit I'm a complete physics newb but I'm searching for a way to make a very low vibration generating tattoo machine to help prevent repetitive strain injuries caused by the vibration of the machine.
If I haven't searched the forum well enough, please feel free to tell me to get lost. :) I'm not looking for specifics but a nudge in the right direction(s) and theories to research would help me a lot.
Thanks.

Current magnetic tattoo guns operate very similar to a doorbell circuit
http://www.one-school.net/Malaysia/...ics/electromagnetism/images/electric-bell.png

I think this might be the right concept?
http://www.faqs.org/patents/imgfull/20110286868_01
But obviously with a completely different application and concept, I'm wondering if the physics required are the same and if it could be made small enough as I only need the length of my oscillation to be in the range of 1/16 of an inch to 3/16 of an inch.
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
Smeezer said:
I would like to know if it's possible to build a dynamo that instead of having an electrical current driven through a coil by movement of a magnet to generate electricity could be driven by ac to move the magnet or coil in a vertical motion instead. If so, (which logically it sounds possible to me), could it be made small enough with low enough energy requirements and take up small enough space to be practical to drive a tattoo needle in a tattoo machine? I'll be the first to admit I'm a complete physics newb but I'm searching for a way to make a very low vibration generating tattoo machine to help prevent repetitive strain injuries caused by the vibration of the machine.
If I haven't searched the forum well enough, please feel free to tell me to get lost. :) I'm not looking for specifics but a nudge in the right direction(s) and theories to research would help me a lot.
Thanks.

Current magnetic tattoo guns operate very similar to a doorbell circuit
http://www.one-school.net/Malaysia/...ics/electromagnetism/images/electric-bell.png

I think this might be the right concept?
http://www.faqs.org/patents/imgfull/20110286868_01
But obviously with a completely different application and concept, I'm wondering if the physics required are the same and if it could be made small enough as I only need the length of my oscillation to be in the range of 1/16 of an inch to 3/16 of an inch.

Welcome to the PF.

Probably a better approach would be to make a counterbalance actuator that cancels out the motion of the tattoo gun. You would have a 2nd actuator that was on the same axis as the needle driver, but moving in the opposite direction to make the overall gun not move at all...
 
Without complicating the design of a tattoo fun further, could it be designed to tolerate a changed armature bar or spring tension (depending of the gun is going to be set up as a shader or a liner) or would it have to be exact? I would think it would have to be exact and it would also increase weight of the machine. Adding several ounces of weight to a tattoo gun would increase hand fatigue in long tattooing sessions as well as adding a significant amount of weight to shaders which need to be as light as reasonably possible and agile.
This is why I'm considering how to make my approach work rather than taking a different one.
Of course my assumptions could be entirely incorrect.
 
Oh and you're welcome :)
 


It is definitely possible to build a reverse dynamo, also known as a linear generator, that can be driven by an alternating current (AC) to move a magnet or coil in a vertical motion. This concept is similar to what is used in electric bell circuits, as you mentioned. However, there are some key differences in the design and application of a reverse dynamo for a tattoo machine.

First, let's discuss the physics behind a reverse dynamo. In a traditional dynamo, the movement of a magnet within a coil creates an electrical current. In a reverse dynamo, an electrical current is applied to a coil, which then creates a magnetic field that moves a magnet in a vertical motion. This movement of the magnet within the coil generates an electrical current in the opposite direction, creating a continuous back and forth motion.

In theory, this concept could be applied to a tattoo machine to reduce vibrations and prevent repetitive strain injuries. However, there are some practical considerations that need to be addressed. For one, the size and energy requirements of the reverse dynamo would need to be carefully designed to fit within the small and precise movements required for tattooing. Additionally, the power source for the AC current would need to be compact and efficient to power the reverse dynamo without adding too much weight or bulk to the tattoo machine.

There are also other factors to consider, such as the speed and force of the vertical motion, as well as the torque required to move the tattoo needle. These would need to be carefully calibrated to ensure the machine is effective in creating tattoos.

In terms of theories to research, you may want to look into the principles of electromagnetism and Faraday's Law, which explain the relationship between electricity and magnetism. You may also want to explore the design and mechanics of linear generators, as well as the different types of AC power sources that could be used in a compact and efficient manner.

Overall, while a reverse dynamo for a tattoo machine is a fascinating concept, it may require some further research and development to make it a practical and effective solution.
 
Hi all I have some confusion about piezoelectrical sensors combination. If i have three acoustic piezoelectrical sensors (with same receive sensitivity in dB ref V/1uPa) placed at specific distance, these sensors receive acoustic signal from a sound source placed at far field distance (Plane Wave) and from broadside. I receive output of these sensors through individual preamplifiers, add them through hardware like summer circuit adder or in software after digitization and in this way got an...
While I was rolling out a shielded cable, a though came to my mind - what happens to the current flow in the cable if there came a short between the wire and the shield in both ends of the cable? For simplicity, lets assume a 1-wire copper wire wrapped in an aluminum shield. The wire and the shield has the same cross section area. There are insulating material between them, and in both ends there is a short between them. My first thought, the total resistance of the cable would be reduced...
I am not an electrical engineering student, but a lowly apprentice electrician. I learn both on the job and also take classes for my apprenticeship. I recently wired my first transformer and I understand that the neutral and ground are bonded together in the transformer or in the service. What I don't understand is, if the neutral is a current carrying conductor, which is then bonded to the ground conductor, why does current only flow back to its source and not on the ground path...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
11K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Back
Top