A rod, a ball, garvitational Potential Energy (U), and the power series expns.

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the gravitational potential energy (GPE) of a system consisting of a rod and a ball, utilizing the power series expansion for ln(1+x). The original poster expresses uncertainty regarding the application of the power series and the relevant equations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between the GPE equation and the power series expansion, with some questioning the origin of ln(1+x) in the context of the problem. There are attempts to integrate over the length of the rod and discussions about the limits of integration.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants offering various insights and approaches. Some guidance has been provided regarding the use of the power series and integration techniques, but there remains a lack of consensus on the correct method to proceed.

Contextual Notes

Participants are grappling with the implications of integrating from infinity to a finite distance and the assumptions regarding the limits of gravitational potential energy. There is also mention of the approximation for small values of x in the power series expansion.

TFM
Messages
1,016
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Mass of rod: M
mass of ball: m
Length of Rod: L
distance between rod and ball: x
GPE is zero at infinty

The questiopn asks to take the GPE of the rod/ball system, using the Power Series Expansion for ln(1+x) .

Homework Equations



U = -GMm/r

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm not quite sure where to start - the Power Series expansion has confused me slightly, as otherwise I wouold hqave just put the variables in the above equation?

TFM :confused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It just means you can approximate ln(1+x) with x, for x << 1.
 
Where does the Ln(x+1)come from?

TFM
 
It'll probably appear as you solve the problem. They say to use the power series to make it easier to solve.
 
Do you still use the U=-GMm/r, with U = 0, r = infinty, giving:

0=-GMm/infinity?

TFM
 
I guess you want to integrate over the length of the rod and end up with the integral of
(1/l+1) dl from 0 to L... that should give you ln(x+1)

U= -GmM/L [integral 0 to L (dl /sqrt. of x^2+l^2)] and I guess you can say that the square root of x^2+l^2 is x+C where C is some constant, though this makes no sense I can't think of any other way

btw, the way I got that is by saying dU= -Gm(dM)/r.. then setting dM=dl(M/L) and r=sqrt. (x^2+l^2)
 
Last edited:
take the intergral of 1/r, which is ln(r), setting your limits from infinity to x. Do you know the expansion to ln(r)?
 
from infinity to x? how in the world do you integrate from infinity to x?
 
t-money said:
take the intergral of 1/r, which is ln(r), setting your limits from infinity to x. Do you know the expansion to ln(r)?

Why do I need to take the integral of 1/r?

TFM
 
  • #10
I'm Still rather cionfused about what I should be doing:frown:

Any Help?

TFM
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
14K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K
Replies
55
Views
6K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K