A skier starts from a hill 1000m high

  • Thread starter Thread starter unholymist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hill
AI Thread Summary
A skier descends from a 1000m high hill, covering 800m down the slope and 700m horizontally. The discussion revolves around calculating her velocity as she passes a tree and addressing why the resulting speed seems unreasonable. The calculations assume no friction and utilize trigonometry to determine acceleration and final velocity. Participants note that mass cannot be determined with the given information and suggest that the high speed may overlook factors like friction and air resistance that would realistically limit the skier's velocity. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of considering additional forces in real-world scenarios.
unholymist
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
A skier starts from a hill 1000m high...

Homework Statement



A skier starts from a hill 1000m high. She skies down the slope a distance of 800m and passes a tree. During this time she has covered a horizontal distance of 700m.

a) Calculate her velocity, in km/h, as she passes the tree.
b) Explain why this is such an unreasonable answer.

Homework Equations



Energy, Motion, Forces as far as I know.

The Attempt at a Solution



http://dl.dropbox.com/u/4481894/%234%20attempt%201058.jpg

That's what I've done so far. I basically assumed no friction and, using trigonometry, solved for her acceleration parallel to the slope. Then, using the equations of motion, I solved for her final velocity parallel to the slope. Whether that was done correctly I am not sure of. However, I am stuck trying to find mass. In part B it asks to explain why that velocity is so unreasonable. I'm thinking it's because it would imply that her mass is quite huge... but I can't prove it with a number, lol.

Anyone want to help? :(
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org


unholymist said:
That's what I've done so far. I basically assumed no friction and, using trigonometry, solved for her acceleration parallel to the slope. Then, using the equations of motion, I solved for her final velocity parallel to the slope. Whether that was done correctly I am not sure of.
Looks good to me.
However, I am stuck trying to find mass.
Why are you trying to find the mass? (You won't be able to, given the information you have.)
In part B it asks to explain why that velocity is so unreasonable. I'm thinking it's because it would imply that her mass is quite huge... but I can't prove it with a number, lol.
Part B is a bit vague. I assume they want you to explain why such a high speed is not reasonable. What additional factors that you have neglected would limit the speed of a skiier?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top