A technical question about the amplituhedron

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter nrqed
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the parameter ##k## in the context of the amplituhedron, specifically its relation to negative helicity particles in amplitudes. Participants explore its mathematical and physical significance, referencing the Grassmannian and the implications of different definitions of ##k##.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the interpretation of ##k##, initially believing it counted negative helicity particles but later finding this assumption incorrect.
  • Another participant confirms that ##Gr## refers to Grassmannian but does not provide further clarification on ##k##.
  • A different participant asserts that ##k## originally represents the R-charge of the ##SU(4)## symmetry, indicating it relates to the number of negative helicity gluons, but notes a later redefinition where ##k \equiv K = k-2##.
  • This redefinition suggests that for the case of four particles, ##k=0## corresponds to an arbitrary number of loops, with implications for the kinematical support of other helicity assignments.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the interpretation of ##k##, with some suggesting it relates to negative helicity particles while others point to its redefinition and implications. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the precise relationship between ##k## and negative helicity particles.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights potential limitations in understanding the definitions and implications of ##k##, particularly in relation to the Grassmannian and the amplituhedron framework.

nrqed
Science Advisor
Messages
3,762
Reaction score
297
One of the ways to introduce the amplituhedron is through the equation ##Y = C Z^T ## where ## Z \in M^+(k+m,n)##, ##C \in Gr_{\leq 0} (k,n)##, ##Y \in Gr(k,k+m)##.

I am trying to understand what the parameter ##k## represents. For a while, I thought that this ##k## was counting the number of particles with negative helicities but that it seems to be incorrect. Can someone help? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thank you. Yes, Gr is for Grassmannian. I know the math,my questions is about how the value ##k## is related to the number of negative helicity particles in the amplitude.
Thanks for your feedback.
 
nrqed said:
I am trying to understand what the parameter ##k## represents
Originally, ##k## is the R-charge of the ##SU(4)## symmetry of the amplitude, so physically it represents the number of negative helicity gluons. Note, however, that the authors later (already in "Into the Amplituhedron" paper, for example) redefine this label according to ##k \equiv K = k-2##. This is why the 4 particle case they consider corresponds to ##n=4##, ##k=0## (and an arbitrary number of loops ##L##). Here ##k## is the new ##k##, i.e. the number of negative helicity gluons minus two. For ##n=4## this is the only non-trivial amplitude to consider since all the other helicity assignments correspond to amplitudes with vanishing kinematical support.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
31
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K