A thought experiment on relativistic Electrostatics

vinven7
Messages
58
Reaction score
0
Here is a thought experiment on Special Relativity involving charges which are rest with respect to each other.

Consider a configuration of charges as shown in the image. Four identical charges (q) are placed at the corners of a square with an opposite charge at the centre (Q). The value of Q is such that the whole configuration is stable and no charge experiences a net force.
It can be shown that for this to work

[Q]/[q]= 1+\sqrt{2^{3}}

Now consider the same configuration of charges in an inertial frame of reference moving at a velocity v relative to a stationary observer. This observer should find the square to be squeezed into a rectangle as the length in the direction of motion will contract.
It should be assumed that the charges would still not experience a net force - as an observer in the same frame of reference as the charge system will not find the charges to be moving.
If the stationary observer calculates the equilibrium of the charges, he should find a new ratio for the charges:

[Q]/[q]= 1+ \sqrt{(1+\gamma^{2})^{3}}

where
\gamma = \sqrt{ 1- \frac{v^{2}}{c^{2}}}

Thus, the observer moving along with the charges will find one ratio for the charges while the observer at rest will observe another ratio.
But how can this be since they are the same system of charges and charge is itself an invariant under relativity?
I hope I have been clear enough. Please ask me if you'd like something cleared.
 

Attachments

  • charge distribution-rest.png
    charge distribution-rest.png
    6.3 KB · Views: 488
  • charge distribution moving.png
    charge distribution moving.png
    8.5 KB · Views: 463
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
vinven7 said:
The value of Q is such that the whole configuration is stable and no charge experiences a net force.
I don't think this is right. It's not possible to have a stable, static equilibrium for a classical system of point charges. This follows from Gauss's law. I think the system you're talking about is in an unstable equilibrium.

vinven7 said:
But how can this be since they are the same system of charges and charge is itself an invariant under relativity?
You have to take into account the magnetic forces that occur in the new frame.
 
bcrowell said:
I don't think this is right. It's not possible to have a stable, static equilibrium for a classical system of point charges. This follows from Gauss's law. I think the system you're talking about is in an unstable equilibrium.

Yes, they are in unstable equilibrium. I was only implying that no charge experiences a net force.


You have to take into account the magnetic forces that occur in the new frame.

In the new frame, the charges themselves are at rest relative to each other. So then why would they experience a magnetic force?
The stationary observer will however find a moving charge and will detect a magnetic field because of it - but I am not sure how the individual charges if/how respond to it.
 
In the new frame, the charges themselves are at rest relative to each other. So then why would they experience a magnetic force?
Because in the new frame they are both moving. A moving charge is equivalent to a current. A current produces a B field that wraps around the current (right hand rule) and is transverse to the direction of motion. The other moving charge experiences a Lorentz force from this B field, F = qv x B. The result is an additional attraction between the charges.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
Back
Top