A tight biinding calcualtion of graphene like structure

  • Thread starter Thread starter mohsen2002
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Graphene Structure
mohsen2002
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
I plot the tight binding bandstructure of graphene. There is a very good aggrement with ab-inition calculation in the valence band. but there is a problem in the non-localized orbitals of conduction band especially in the Gama(0,0) point.
Any suggestion is appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you're comparing the results of a DFT calculation to a phenomenological nearest-neighbour tight-binding Hamiltonian then you should find that in the tight-binding band structure the conduction and valence bands are symmetric about the Dirac point (about the line E=0).

From a DFT calculation you should find that actually the two bands are not symmetric about this energy - the valence band appears to be flatter than the conduction band as far as I remember. I think this was due to the basis states not being mutually orthogonal (you should look in the Dresselhaus-Dresselhaus book on nanotubes).

If you want to reproduce the asymmetry between the two bands in the tight-binding Hamiltonian you can include a small next-nearest-neighbour coupling (say one tenth of the nearest-neighbour coupling).

If that doesn't help maybe you could just show us some plots and indicate what is wrong with them.
 
Thanks for your reply,
The effect of next nearest neighbor on the band structure is very small. My question is:
Why the mail problem is around the Gama (Kx=Ky=0) point in FBZ?
Here is a sample fitting for hexagonal Boron Nitride. (black line are DFT result and red line as a tight binding calculation)
 

Attachments

  • clip_image002.png
    clip_image002.png
    4.3 KB · Views: 543
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top