I A two-fold quantum delayed-choice experiment

TJung
Messages
16
Reaction score
3
Hello everyone, I am not a physicist but I have been studying this subject. I came across an article and I'm having trouble understanding. I would appreciate if you could help me.

https://arxiv.org/pdf/1103.0117v2.pdf

Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
TJung said:
Hello everyone, I am not a physicist but I have been studying this subject. I came across an article and I'm having trouble understanding. I would appreciate if you could help me.

https://arxiv.org/pdf/1103.0117v2.pdf

Thanks.
If what you are interest in is the delayed choice experiment there are easier ones than your link (look around the web until one strikes your fancy).
In the 2nd paragraph of the body he says that you will notice interference fringes if BS_2 is present. That is not my understanding (whatever it means), rather all clicks will happen at D_1.
 
Zafa Pi said:
If what you are interest in is the delayed choice experiment there are easier ones than your link (look around the web until one strikes your fancy).
In the 2nd paragraph of the body he says that you will notice interference fringes if BS_2 is present. That is not my understanding (whatever it means), rather all clicks will happen at D_1.

Thanks for the reply Zafa. I've seen a lot of delayed choice experiments, but this one adds something.
Actually the experiment I was referring to is this one. My mistake in the first post, the one there is justa gedanken experiment, very similar.

https://arxiv.org/pdf/1608.04908.pdf

Here some intertesting things:

*WPD = which-path detector

"The quantum properties of the WPD allows erasure of the which- path information associated with the post-selected particle- like behavior, implementing a two-fold delayed-choice pro- cedure and illustrating the wave-particle complementarity in an unprecedented manner."

"The two-fold delayed-choice procedure provides a clear demonstration that the behavior with or without interference is not a realistic property of the test system: It depends not only on the delayed choice of the WPD’s state, but also on how we later measure the WPD and correlate the outcomes with the data of the test system."
 
TJung said:
Hello everyone, I am not a physicist but I have been studying this subject. I came across an article and I'm having trouble understanding. I would appreciate if you could help me.

https://arxiv.org/pdf/1103.0117v2.pdf

Thanks.

Quirk will happily simulate the circuit from that paper for you for various parameters:

dc-circuit.gif


It can also do the circuits from the other paper.

One thing you need to watch out for in these experiments is: when they say erasure, do they mean post-selection? Often they end up talking about the amazing powers of accidentally cherry-picking data instead of talking about quantum mechanics specifically.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top