About a spacecraft trip to the asteroids

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the optimal strategy for a spaceship in Earth orbit to reach the asteroid belt for mining purposes. Two main trajectory options are considered: increasing the ship's orbital speed to escape Earth's gravity retrograde or prograde, with the latter potentially offering a more efficient delta-V for reaching the desired orbit. The use of a Hohmann transfer orbit is suggested as the best method for reaching the asteroid belt without gravitational slingshots. Additionally, the challenges of setting up a Lagrangian for the mission are highlighted, particularly in incorporating thrust and planetary influences. Overall, careful trajectory planning is essential for minimizing energy costs and maximizing efficiency in asteroid missions.
Emspak
Messages
240
Reaction score
1
This was something I was kicking around and wanted some advice on.

Let's assume you had a big spaceship -- the kind you'd use t set off on a trip to the Asteroids, and were willing to take some time about it, on the order of a couple of years. Maybe you want to do asteroid mining or mine iceteroids for volatiles.

You're in Earth orbit, where the thing was built. You have a nice, big, NERVA type engine.

Which is the better plan, with the best combination of shorter travel time with energy efficiency:

-- Increase the ship's orbital speed around Earth -- let's say it starts in MEO - and get it to escape velocity in the direction retrograde to Earth's orbit. That will slow it down relative to the Sun, and the ship can fall in and slingshot around to the asteroids. When the ship is deep in the sun's gravity well you could even do a burn and boost its speed further, and get a nice long parabolic / extremely elliptical trajectory to the relevant spot.

-- Same thing, but going prograde, and using the free velocity you get from being around Earth and traveling with it to boost out to Mars and past it, since the delta-V would be (I think) less to get the same nice orbit out to between Mars and Jupiter, which is approximately where you want to be.

-- Some kind of VEGA trajectory.

I was also curious about how to set of a good langrangian for this. Was thinking of using the sun as my origin, but if anyone has a better idea please!

(And I was thinking of modeling this on Mathematica for giggles, but I don't know if it would work at all well as I am a beginner)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Getting close to the sun (to use the Oberth effect there) needs such a large delta_v that it is not reasonable for most solar system missions. To reach the asteroid belt (similar to Dawn), and without gravitational slingshots at planets, a Hohmann orbit is the best way.

I was also curious about how to set of a good langrangian for this.
The potential is known, the kinetic energy term is easy... setting up a Lagrangian is not the issue, finding solutions (if you include thrust or planets) is.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
thanks -- this helps a lot...
 
If you first drop down deep in the sun's gravity well and set up an elliptical orbit that gets you to an asteroid, you still have to make a burn when you get to the asteroid to match its orbit (if you want to rendezvous). That means that you have to bring that part of the orbit deep in the sun's gravity well up to the asteroid, and that's going to be extremely costly.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top