About Blocks, torques and wedges

  • Thread starter Thread starter willworkforfood
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Blocks Torques
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding how to apply Newton's second law for torque and linear motion in a problem involving blocks, torques, and wedges. The user expresses confusion about incorporating frictional forces and torque simultaneously, and struggles with drawing effective free body diagrams. They seek clarification on how to determine the torque created by the wheel and whether the angle of a second torque on an incline affects calculations. Despite reviewing related resources, the user finds that their attempts at free body diagrams yield incorrect answers. The conversation highlights the complexities of combining torque and force analysis in physics problems.
willworkforfood
Messages
54
Reaction score
0
Problem picture below:

http://portfolio.iu.edu/whoblitz/problem2.PNG

I know Newton's second law for torque torquenet=I*alpha and regular old Fnet=m*a, but I don't see how they fit together here (how I can account for frictional forces and torque at the same time). Help appreciated, thanks :smile:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you drawn a free body diagram and summed up all the forces in each direction?
 
My problem with that is I don't know what to put for the force of the torque(s
? one or two) created by the wheel.
 
Still not working out to even close to the right answer here and drawing a free body diagram isn't helping the situation as it is just confusing me more with force components, et. al.
 
Still isn't helping, I keep drawing the free body diagrams and getting wrong and different answers. After solving for the torque forces (tensions) in that example, does it make a difference that the second torque is at an angle on an incline?

What would the equation for the net torque even look like in this problem? Is there some easier way to do this than ugly free body diagrams?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top