A About collimation in Czerny-Turner spectrometers

  • A
  • Thread starter Thread starter Rigelleo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    collimation Optics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the design of an unfolded Czerny-Turner spectrometer using toroidal mirrors to minimize off-axis astigmatism. The designer has created an optimal off-axis collimator but still experiences some astigmatism on the detector due to limited degrees of freedom with only two mirrors. There is a debate on whether it is necessary to achieve collimation in the second plane or to compensate for astigmatism on the grating. Simulations suggest that altering the transverse radius of curvature of the toroidal mirror can reduce astigmatism but may lead to slight convergence of rays in the perpendicular plane. The conclusion indicates that while balancing coma aberration is achievable, managing astigmatism may require additional adjustments for optimal sharpness.
Rigelleo
Messages
1
Reaction score
2
Goodmorning,
I'm designing an unfolded Czerny-Turner spectrometer like the one in picture

1702628986323.png

I'm trying to use toroidal mirrors to decrease off axis astigmatism.
In my first try i made an optimal off-axis collimator (Mirror 1), a mirror that has a good collimation in both the planes: the plane of the layout that you can see in the picture and the plane perpendicolar to this layout. This solution decreases astigmatism in both the grating and the detector but since there are few degrees of freedom avaiable by using only two mirrors (even if they are toroidal) to archieve two goals i still have some astigmatism on the detector.

After that i am wondering if it is really necessary to collimate in the second plane, if it is really necessary to compensate astigmatism on the grating.
In the simulations with Zemax I noticed that by changing more the transverse radius of curvature of the toroidal collimating mirror I can reduce astigmatism more efficiently, but this happens by sacrificing collimation on this plane, in this plane (the one perpendicular to the plane of the layout) the rays they come out of the collimator slightly convergent.
I was wondering if this could be a problem, my first impression is that it shouldn't be a problem because in grating equation the angle of incidence is the component on the plane of the layout.

Is this reasoning correct? Am I missing something?

Best regards
 
Science news on Phys.org
In Czerny-Turner spectrometer one wavelength in a middle of spectral range can be balanced for coma aberration. Coma would change the sign at balanced wavelength passing zero value. I would not struggle with astigmatism, just adding a defocus it is possible to get one of astigmatism focies making the best sharpness across the slit. Sharpness along slit is not important.
 
After my surgery this year, gas remained in my eye for a while. The light air bubbles appeared to sink to the bottom, and I realized that the brain was processing the information to invert the up/down/left/right image transferred to the retina. I have a question about optics and ophthalmology. Does the inversion of the image transferred to the retina depend on the position of the intraocular focal point of the lens of the eye? For example, in people with farsightedness, the focal point is...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top