A About collimation in Czerny-Turner spectrometers

  • A
  • Thread starter Thread starter Rigelleo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    collimation Optics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the design of an unfolded Czerny-Turner spectrometer using toroidal mirrors to minimize off-axis astigmatism. The designer has created an optimal off-axis collimator but still experiences some astigmatism on the detector due to limited degrees of freedom with only two mirrors. There is a debate on whether it is necessary to achieve collimation in the second plane or to compensate for astigmatism on the grating. Simulations suggest that altering the transverse radius of curvature of the toroidal mirror can reduce astigmatism but may lead to slight convergence of rays in the perpendicular plane. The conclusion indicates that while balancing coma aberration is achievable, managing astigmatism may require additional adjustments for optimal sharpness.
Rigelleo
Messages
1
Reaction score
2
Goodmorning,
I'm designing an unfolded Czerny-Turner spectrometer like the one in picture

1702628986323.png

I'm trying to use toroidal mirrors to decrease off axis astigmatism.
In my first try i made an optimal off-axis collimator (Mirror 1), a mirror that has a good collimation in both the planes: the plane of the layout that you can see in the picture and the plane perpendicolar to this layout. This solution decreases astigmatism in both the grating and the detector but since there are few degrees of freedom avaiable by using only two mirrors (even if they are toroidal) to archieve two goals i still have some astigmatism on the detector.

After that i am wondering if it is really necessary to collimate in the second plane, if it is really necessary to compensate astigmatism on the grating.
In the simulations with Zemax I noticed that by changing more the transverse radius of curvature of the toroidal collimating mirror I can reduce astigmatism more efficiently, but this happens by sacrificing collimation on this plane, in this plane (the one perpendicular to the plane of the layout) the rays they come out of the collimator slightly convergent.
I was wondering if this could be a problem, my first impression is that it shouldn't be a problem because in grating equation the angle of incidence is the component on the plane of the layout.

Is this reasoning correct? Am I missing something?

Best regards
 
Science news on Phys.org
In Czerny-Turner spectrometer one wavelength in a middle of spectral range can be balanced for coma aberration. Coma would change the sign at balanced wavelength passing zero value. I would not struggle with astigmatism, just adding a defocus it is possible to get one of astigmatism focies making the best sharpness across the slit. Sharpness along slit is not important.
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top