About comparison to experimental reference values

In summary, the conversation discusses the use of statistical methods to compare experimental reference values with other measurements. Different methods can be used depending on the type of data and desired outcome. The rule of thumb is to treat reference values like any other measurement and to propagate errors to see if there is agreement. The number of degrees of freedom can be determined by subtracting the number of restrictions from the number of data points.
  • #1
chastiell
11
0
Hi again, probably this seems to be a simply question, but in last days i becomes a really strange one.

We all know that there are many kinds of constants in physics, some of them, are found experimentally with great accuracy in too expensive projects, but no matter how accurate can be measured such constant, they still have uncertainty. So imagine we made an experiment were any constant of this kind is measured , charge electron, charge to mass ratio, Newton gravitatory constant , ...

How to achieve an hypothesis proof on this constants considering that they have uncertainty ?

I has been searching this on Internet, but the nearest answer is given by the comparison of two gaussian variables with the t student distribution using:

t={|\bar{X_1}-\bar{X_2}|\over \sqrt{{\sigma_1^2\over n_1}+{\sigma_1^2\over n_2}}}
where
\sigma_i^2
are the estimators of variance of each variable

but in this form is assumed that the values n_i are known , thing that is not true for the experimental reference values , and this restrict us to always use a mean value, what if we determine this by linear fit, nonlinear fit ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
You are correct to use statistical methods to do the comparison ... the same as with any two statistical variables.
There are a wide range of methods depending on the kind of data you have and what you want to be able to say.

Rule of thumb:
Reference values should be treated like any other measurement.
If you just want to see if two measurements agree, then take the difference and propagate the errors - if they agree then the difference will be within some stated confidence value of zero.
 
  • #3
Simon Bridge said:
You are correct to use statistical methods to do the comparison ... the same as with any two statistical variables.
There are a wide range of methods depending on the kind of data you have and what you want to be able to say.

Rule of thumb:
Reference values should be treated like any other measurement.
If you just want to see if two measurements agree, then take the difference and propagate the errors - if they agree then the difference will be within some stated confidence value of zero.

Thanks for the answer it is really useful ! . After reading this, i thought the next question ... suppose that the t student test is used to do the comparison ... considering that experimental reference value is treated like any other measurent the number of degrees of freedom would be n or n-1 ?
 
  • #4
How do you normally determine the degrees of freedom?
 
  • #5
number of degrees of freedom ndf :
ndf = n-r

n : number of data
r : number of restrictions

usually in this kind of test i use r = 1
 
  • #6
Then you have your answer.
 

Related to About comparison to experimental reference values

What does "comparison to experimental reference values" mean?

Comparison to experimental reference values is the process of comparing the results of an experiment to previously established values or data that have been obtained through experiments or studies. This allows scientists to evaluate the accuracy and validity of their findings.

Why is comparison to experimental reference values important in scientific research?

Comparison to experimental reference values is important because it allows scientists to assess the reliability and reproducibility of their experiments. It also helps to identify any potential errors or biases in the experimental setup and provides a basis for further analysis and interpretation of the results.

How is comparison to experimental reference values typically performed?

Comparison to experimental reference values is typically performed by calculating the percent difference between the experimental results and the reference values. This can be done using a simple formula: (|experimental value - reference value| / reference value) x 100%. A smaller percent difference indicates a closer agreement between the two values.

What are some potential sources of error when comparing to experimental reference values?

Some potential sources of error when comparing to experimental reference values include measurement errors, human error, equipment malfunctions, and variations in experimental conditions. It is important for scientists to carefully control and account for these factors to ensure accurate and reliable results.

Are there any limitations to comparison to experimental reference values?

Yes, there are some limitations to comparison to experimental reference values. One limitation is that reference values may not always be available or may not accurately represent the specific conditions of the experiment. Additionally, comparison to reference values does not guarantee the accuracy or validity of the experimental results, as there may still be other factors that can affect the outcome of the experiment.

Similar threads

  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
2
Replies
46
Views
4K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • Classical Physics
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
15
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
1
Views
667
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
20
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top