About dark matter and the limits of the universe.

WindScars
Messages
50
Reaction score
0
1. Is the universe finite?

2. Could it be just the surface of a higher dimensional object?

3. If something travels across the universe will it reach the same point?

4. Could the effects of the accelerating universe, that scientist credit dark matter to, be just a side effect of some higher-dimensional twist that we weren't able to calculate yet?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This should be in the Cosmology forum; but, here goes.

1) Unknown.

2) It could be (this usually goes under the name of "brane theories"); but, there's no evidence to point one way or the other on this.

3) No. Even if the universe is finite and closed, the accelerating expansion will prevent anything from making it all the way around.

4) I think you mean "that scientists accredit to dark energy." And, again, that might be possible; but, nothing we know necessarily points to it.
 
But if the universe is the surface of a higher dimensional space would not you end up in the some point?
 
WindScars said:
But if the universe is the surface of a higher dimensional space would not you end up in the some point?
The surface is expanding (at an accelerating rate) and you'd have to go faster than light (which is impossible) to complete a circuit.
 
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
47
Views
634
Replies
13
Views
3K
Back
Top