About the mass-energy relation

  • Thread starter Thread starter snoopies622
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Relation
snoopies622
Messages
852
Reaction score
29
I see how the premises

<br /> <br /> p = \gamma m v<br /> <br />

<br /> <br /> F = \frac {dp}{dt}<br /> <br />

and

<br /> <br /> <br /> W= \int F dx<br /> <br />

lead to

<br /> <br /> dW = mc^2 d \gamma<br /> <br />

and therefore

<br /> <br /> W = \gamma mc^2 + k<br /> <br />

where m is the rest mass and k is a constant of integration. But why do we conclude that k=0?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That constant won't equal 0. (The work done equals the KE, not the total energy.) Assume you start from rest and integrate to speed v.
 
I get

<br /> <br /> W = \gamma mc^2 - mc ^2 = ( \gamma - 1 ) mc^2 <br /> <br /> <br />

so

<br /> <br /> k = -mc^2 \neq 0<br /> <br />

Since W(v=0) = 0 this is indeed the kinetic energy and not the total energy. Thanks, Doc Al.
 
Follow-up: Am I to conclude that the constant of integration here represents the (negative) "rest energy" of the object, or is there a better way to arrive at that relationship?
 
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...
Back
Top