Absolute value equations with extraneous solutions

pempem
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I'm a little confused about solving absolute value equations and why sometimes solutions don't seem to make sense.

Take a look at case (ii) on this website:
http://www.algebralab.org/lessons/lesson.aspx?file=Algebra_AbsoluteValueEquations.xml

I understand the process of solving the equation, and I understand how they arrive at the two solutions. The only problem is, 8/3 is not actually a solution! You can see this by the simple fact that the left side of the equation has to be positive (since the entire left side is inside the absolute value "brackets"). Since 8/3 - 5 is a negative number, it can't be equal to the left side! When you plug in 8/3 you get 7/3 = - 7/3 which does not make sense.

The website claims 8/3 is a solution, but it certainly doesn't seem like it is. Can someone explain, in a mathematical sense, why this discrepancy comes about? Is there any way to know that an answer is extraneous or should one always check solutions to absolute value equations to make sure they are indeed solutions?

Thanks!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You are completely correct that 8/3 is NOT a solution to |2x- 3|= x- 5.

On the right 2(8/3- 3= 16/3- 9/3= 7/3 while on the right 8/3- 5= 8/3- 15/3= -7/3.


Unfortunately, there are a number of "algebra" and "mathematics" sites like this one that are full of errors.
 
Good, I thought I was going crazy haha

In that case, what about the second part of my question: why does this discrepancy happen? Is there any way to know that an answer is extraneous or should one always check solutions to absolute value equations to make sure they are indeed solutions?

Thanks for your response!
 
According to Wolfram Alpha , x=-2 is also not a solution. This equation has no solutions .
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top