MHB Absolute Value with two expressions.

stuart4512
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
How do I do this? I have tried a few methods and end up getting x values that don't work when placed back into the equation.

View attachment 3670
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.png
    Untitled.png
    3.4 KB · Views: 86
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I would write the expression as a piecewise function:

$$f(x)=\begin{cases}-3x-5, & x<-1 \\[3pt] x-1, & -1\le x\le2 \\[3pt] 3x-5, & 2<x \\ \end{cases}$$

Can you proceed?

edit: I have moved this thread here from our Linear Algebra subforum, as this is a better fit. :D
 
I got the only solution to be at x=1.
How do I sketch the area between -1 and 2?
 
stuart4512 said:
I got the only solution to be at x=1.
How do I sketch the area between -1 and 2?

You should find 2 valid roots. Check the root of each piece, and if it is in the given domain for that piece, then it is a valid root.

As for the middle piece, just compute the end points, and connect them with a line segment.

$$f(-1)=-2$$

$$f(2)=1$$

So, plot the points $(-1,-2),\,(2,1)$ and connect them.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top