Absolute Values in Separable Differential Equations

AI Thread Summary
In solving separable differential equations, the absolute values are effectively handled by recognizing that the exponential function is always positive. The transformation from ln|v-49| to |v-49|=e^(-t/5+C) leads to the realization that v-49 can take on both positive and negative values, represented as v-49=±e^(-t/5+C). This results in the equation v-49=c*e^(-t/5), where the constant c absorbs the ± sign. Thus, the absolute values are accounted for in the new constant. This clarification helps in understanding the behavior of solutions to these equations.
patrickbotros
Messages
34
Reaction score
1
When solving a separable differential equation, my textbook says this:
ln|v-49|=-t/5+C→
|v-49|=e-t/5+C
v=49+ce-t/5
What happened to the absolute values? I think it has something to do with the exponential always being positive.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
patrickbotros said:
When solving a separable differential equation, my textbook says this:
ln|v-49|=-t/5+C→
|v-49|=e-t/5+C
v=49+ce-t/5
What happened to the absolute values? I think it has something to do with the exponential always being positive.
The equation ##\displaystyle\ |v-49|=e^{-t/5+C}\ ## is equivalent to
##\displaystyle\ v-49=\pm e^{-t/5+C}\ ## → ##\displaystyle\ v-49=c\, e^{-t/5}\ ##, where ##\ c = \pm\ln(C) ##​
So the new constant, c, (lower case) absorbs the ± .
 
SammyS said:
The equation ##\displaystyle\ |v-49|=e^{-t/5+C}\ ## is equivalent to
##\displaystyle\ v-49=\pm e^{-t/5+C}\ ## → ##\displaystyle\ v-49=c\, e^{-t/5}\ ##, where ##\ c = \pm\ln(C) ##​
So the new constant, c, (lower case) absorbs the ± .
Ohhhh. HAHA!:oldlaugh: That was dumb :)
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
25
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Back
Top