Absorption coefficient per unit path length determined for excitation

vincectec
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
How is the absorption coefficient per unit path length determined for excitation sites in a host crystal with an excitation site density of N and a bandgap of the excitation site equal to the photon energy? What I am trying to determine is how many photons will be absorbed for a given length.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


vincectec said:
How is the absorption coefficient per unit path length determined for excitation sites in a host crystal with an excitation site density of N and a bandgap of the excitation site equal to the photon energy? What I am trying to determine is how many photons will be absorbed for a given length.


Fermi's golden rule.
 


OK but I don't know about Hamiltonian and Eigen functions and have never solved a Schrodinger equation. So, with this in mind can you direct me to a first principles text that will prepare me to deal with "Fermi's Golden Rule" knowing that I don't have the above prerequisites but do have some calculus capability?

What I am trying to do is determine: for excitation cites of density N, how many electrons will be released into the conduction band, assuming that the stimulus photons have an energy equal to the bandgap energy of the excitation site.
 


vincectec said:
OK but I don't know about Hamiltonian and Eigen functions and have never solved a Schrodinger equation. So, with this in mind can you direct me to a first principles text that will prepare me to deal with "Fermi's Golden Rule" knowing that I don't have the above prerequisites but do have some calculus capability?

What I am trying to do is determine: for excitation cites of density N, how many electrons will be released into the conduction band, assuming that the stimulus photons have an energy equal to the bandgap energy of the excitation site.

Maybe Sakurai's book on quantum mechanics would be useful to you. Look up "absorption" or "golden rule" in the appendix. Good luck
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top