Proving Monotonicity of f(x) in [0,1] with Limited Difference

In summary, an abstract function is a function that is defined but not implemented, serving as a placeholder for subclasses to define. They are useful for creating a blueprint for subclasses to follow and ensuring consistency in function sets. Abstract functions cannot be called and are declared using the "abstract" keyword. A class can have a mix of abstract and non-abstract functions, with the former typically used in classes with subclasses and the latter providing functionality for the class itself.
  • #1
Zhujiao
3
0

Homework Statement


Function f(x) defined in [0,1],and f(0)=f(1).If [tex]x_{1},x_{2}\in[0,1][/tex] then [tex]|f(x_{1})-f(x_{2})|<|x_{1}-x_{2}|[/tex] (*)
Prove [tex]|f(x_{1})-f(x_{2})|<1/2[/tex]


Homework Equations


I think maybe |a|-|b|[tex]\leq[/tex]|a-b|[tex]\leq[/tex]|a|+|b| will be helpful


The Attempt at a Solution


Well,I get some information from (*),I can prove that f(x)+x is monotone increasing and f(x)-x is monotone decreasing.Then I don't know what I should do. And I'm not sure whether I'm in the right way.

PS: why I can't see LaTex images clearly.They appear to be a black background and letters numbers or signs are not easy to recognize
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
.

Thank you for your post. I would be happy to help you with your problem. First, let's start with the given information. We know that f(x) is a function defined in the closed interval [0,1], and that f(0)=f(1). This means that the function is continuous and that the values at the endpoints are equal.

Next, we have the inequality |f(x1)-f(x2)|<|x1-x2|, which can also be written as |f(x1)-f(x2)|/|x1-x2|<1. This tells us that the absolute value of the slope of the secant line connecting any two points on the graph of f(x) is always less than 1.

Now, let's consider the points x1=0 and x2=1/2. Plugging these values into the inequality, we get |f(0)-f(1/2)|<|0-1/2|, which simplifies to |f(1/2)|<1/2. Since we know that f(0)=f(1), we can also write this as |f(0)-f(1)|<1/2.

From this, we can see that the maximum difference between any two points on the graph of f(x) is 1/2. This means that |f(x1)-f(x2)|<1/2 for any two points x1 and x2 in the interval [0,1]. Therefore, we have proved that |f(x1)-f(x2)|<1/2 for all x1 and x2 in [0,1].

As for your attempt at a solution, it seems like you are on the right track. However, instead of trying to prove that f(x)+x and f(x)-x are monotone increasing and decreasing, you can use the given inequality to directly prove the desired result.

I hope this helps. As for the issue with the LaTex images, it may be a problem with your internet connection or browser. You can try clearing your browser's cache and reloading the page. If the problem persists, you can try using a different browser or contacting the website administrator for assistance.
 
  • #3


I would approach this problem by first defining the terms and variables involved. In this case, we are given a function f(x) defined in the interval [0,1] and we are also given the condition that f(0) = f(1). The statement (*) tells us that the difference between the values of f(x) at any two points in [0,1] is always less than the difference between those two points.

To prove that |f(x1) - f(x2)| < 1/2, we can start by using the triangle inequality, which states that for any two real numbers a and b, |a-b| ≤ |a| + |b|.

Using this inequality, we can rewrite the statement (*) as |f(x1) - f(x2)| ≤ |x1 - x2|. Since we are trying to prove that |f(x1) - f(x2)| is less than 1/2, we can set up the following inequality: |f(x1) - f(x2)| < 1/2.

Now, we can substitute the previous inequality into this one: |x1 - x2| < 1/2. This is true for any two points x1 and x2 in [0,1], so we can say that the difference between any two points in [0,1] is always less than 1/2.

Since f(x) is a continuous function, this means that the difference between any two values of f(x) in [0,1] is also less than 1/2. Therefore, we can conclude that |f(x1) - f(x2)| < 1/2 for all x1 and x2 in [0,1], which proves the statement.

As for the issue with the LaTeX images, it could be a problem with your browser or device. I would suggest trying to view the page on a different device or clearing your browser's cache and cookies. If the issue persists, you can try reaching out to the website's technical support team for assistance.
 

What is an abstract function?

An abstract function is a function that is defined but not implemented. It is a placeholder for a function that will be defined in a subclass or inherited class.

Why use abstract functions?

Abstract functions are useful for creating a blueprint for subclasses to follow. They ensure that all subclasses will have the same set of functions, but with different implementations.

Can abstract functions be called?

No, abstract functions cannot be called. They only serve as a template for subclasses to implement.

How do you declare an abstract function?

To declare an abstract function, you use the "abstract" keyword in the function declaration. This indicates to the compiler that this function is abstract and must be implemented in a subclass.

Can a class have both abstract and non-abstract functions?

Yes, a class can have a combination of abstract and non-abstract functions. Abstract functions are typically used in classes that have subclasses, but non-abstract functions can also be used to provide functionality for the class itself.

Similar threads

  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
823
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
397
  • Calculus
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
1K
Back
Top