Abstract - Prove (A-B)union(B-A)=(AunionB)-(AintersectB)

  • Thread starter Thread starter kathrynag
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Abstract
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves proving a set equality involving the operations of union, intersection, and set difference. The subject area is set theory.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the definitions of set operations and explore the implications of elements belonging to specific sets. There is an attempt to establish the inclusion of one set in another and to clarify the conditions under which elements satisfy the set definitions.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, breaking down the requirements for elements in the sets involved. Some guidance has been offered regarding the logical steps needed to prove the equality, and there is a collaborative effort to visualize the relationships between the sets.

Contextual Notes

There appears to be some uncertainty regarding the visualization of set relationships and the implications of element membership in the context of the proof.

kathrynag
Messages
595
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Prove:
(A-B)[tex]\cup[/tex](B-A)=(A[tex]\cup[/tex]B)-(A[tex]\cap[/tex]B)

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


We need to show (A-B)[tex]\cup[/tex](B-A)[tex]\subseteq[/tex](A[tex]\cup[/tex]B)-(A[tex]\cap[/tex]B)
and (A[tex]\cup[/tex]B)-(A[tex]\cap[/tex]B)[tex]\supseteq[/tex](A-B)[tex]\cup[/tex](B-A).

We begin by showing the first:
Let x[tex]\in[/tex](A-B)[tex]\cup[/tex](B-A).
By definition of union, x[tex]\in[/tex]A-B or x[tex]\in[/tex]B-A.
If x[tex]\in[/tex]A-B, we know x[tex]\in[/tex]A ...


This is where I've begun to get stuck. Not sure where to go next.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
We know x is in A, AND x is NOT in B.

What does it mean for an element to be in [tex]A\cup B- A\cap B[/tex]? Is x inside of it in this case?
 
An elelemnt is in A or B and not in A and B.
 
So does the x that we were looking at satisfy that requirement?
 
I'm thinking yes, but I'm having trouble visualizing that just from the x an element of A and not B.
 
Just break it down into simple pieces. If x is an element of A and not an element of B:

1. Is x in A or B?
2. Is x in A and B?

Therefore...
 
x is in A or B, but not in A and B.
Therefore, we have the right side of the equation.

Ok, but what about if x is an element of B-A?
x is in B, bot not in A.
Then x is in B or A, but not in B and A.
So, therefore, we have the right side of the equation.

Ok, and then I just work the other way to prove equality?
 
Yup.
 
Thanks a lot. That makes a lot more sense now.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K