Proving Set Identity: A ∪ (B - A) = ∅ Explanation

In summary: As for why this intersection is empty, consider the definition of set subtraction: ##B - A = \{x | x \in B \land x \notin A\}##. This means that B - A contains all elements of B that are not in A. So in order for an element x to be in B - A, it has to be both in B and not in A. But in the expression ##A \cap (B - A)##, we are looking for elements that are both in A and in B - A. Since B - A only contains elements that are not in A, there can be no elements that satisfy both of these conditions, thus the intersection is empty.
  • #1
Mr Davis 97
1,462
44

Homework Statement


The problem is to prove that ##A \cup (B - A) = \varnothing##

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


The solution in the textbook is that
##A \cup (B-A) = \{x~ |~ x \in A \land (x \in B \land x \not\in A) \} = \{x~ |~ x \in A \land x \not\in A \land x \in B \} = \{x~ | ~ F\} = \varnothing##. I am just confused as to why ##\{x~ | ~ F\} = \varnothing##. Why is that logically a consequence?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Mr Davis 97 said:

Homework Statement


The problem is to prove that ##A \cup (B - A) = \varnothing##

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


The solution in the textbook is that
##A \cup (B-A) = \{x~ |~ x \in A \land (x \in B \land x \not\in A) \} = \{x~ |~ x \in A \land x \not\in A \land x \in B \} = \{x~ | ~ F\} = \varnothing##. I am just confused as to why ##\{x~ | ~ F\} = \varnothing##. Why is that logically a consequence?
Well, first of all, it should be an intersection ##\cap## (and), not a union ##\cup## (or).
Then ##\{x\,\vert \,F\}## is the set of all ##x##, which satisfy ##"false"##. But ##"false"## is never satisfied, thus ##\emptyset##.
 
  • Like
Likes Mr Davis 97
  • #3
Mr Davis 97 said:
##A \cup (B-A) = \{x~ |~ x \in A \land (x \in B \land x \not\in A) \}##
To expand on what fresh_42 said, the expression on the right is the definition of ##A \cap (B - A)##; i.e., the intersection of A and B - A, not the union of these two sets.
 

FAQ: Proving Set Identity: A ∪ (B - A) = ∅ Explanation

What is a set identity?

A set identity is a mathematical statement that shows the equality of two sets. It is usually represented using set notation, such as A = B, where A and B are sets.

How is a set identity different from an equation?

While both a set identity and an equation use symbols to represent values, a set identity involves sets while an equation involves numbers or variables. Additionally, a set identity must hold true for all elements in the sets, while an equation only needs to hold true for specific values.

How can I prove a set identity?

To prove a set identity, you must show that each element in one set is also in the other set, and vice versa. This can be done using set operations, such as union, intersection, and complement, as well as mathematical properties, such as the associative and commutative properties.

Can a set identity be disproved?

Yes, a set identity can be disproved by finding a counterexample, which is an element that exists in one set but not in the other. This would show that the two sets are not equal and the set identity is false.

Are there any tips for proving a set identity?

One helpful tip is to work from one side of the set identity and manipulate it using set operations and properties until it is equivalent to the other side. Another tip is to use diagrams or Venn diagrams to visualize the sets and their elements. Additionally, it can be helpful to start by proving smaller, simpler set identities before tackling more complex ones.

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
25
Views
4K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Back
Top