Proving Set Identity: A ∪ (B - A) = ∅ Explanation

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mr Davis 97
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Identity Set
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving the set identity A ∪ (B - A) = ∅. The solution provided in the textbook demonstrates that A ∪ (B - A) can be expressed as {x | x ∈ A ∧ (x ∈ B ∧ x ∉ A)}, which simplifies to {x | x ∈ A ∧ x ∉ A ∧ x ∈ B} = {x | F} = ∅. The confusion arises from understanding why {x | F} equals the empty set, which is clarified by recognizing that the expression represents a contradiction, thus yielding no elements.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of set theory concepts, particularly union and intersection.
  • Familiarity with logical expressions and their implications.
  • Knowledge of the notation for sets and operations on sets.
  • Basic principles of mathematical proof techniques.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the definitions and properties of set operations, specifically union (∪) and intersection (∩).
  • Explore logical expressions and their truth values in mathematical contexts.
  • Learn about proof techniques in set theory, including direct proofs and proof by contradiction.
  • Examine examples of set identities and their proofs to reinforce understanding.
USEFUL FOR

Students of mathematics, particularly those studying set theory, logic, and proof techniques. This discussion is beneficial for anyone looking to deepen their understanding of set identities and logical reasoning in mathematical proofs.

Mr Davis 97
Messages
1,461
Reaction score
44

Homework Statement


The problem is to prove that ##A \cup (B - A) = \varnothing##

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


The solution in the textbook is that
##A \cup (B-A) = \{x~ |~ x \in A \land (x \in B \land x \not\in A) \} = \{x~ |~ x \in A \land x \not\in A \land x \in B \} = \{x~ | ~ F\} = \varnothing##. I am just confused as to why ##\{x~ | ~ F\} = \varnothing##. Why is that logically a consequence?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Mr Davis 97 said:

Homework Statement


The problem is to prove that ##A \cup (B - A) = \varnothing##

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


The solution in the textbook is that
##A \cup (B-A) = \{x~ |~ x \in A \land (x \in B \land x \not\in A) \} = \{x~ |~ x \in A \land x \not\in A \land x \in B \} = \{x~ | ~ F\} = \varnothing##. I am just confused as to why ##\{x~ | ~ F\} = \varnothing##. Why is that logically a consequence?
Well, first of all, it should be an intersection ##\cap## (and), not a union ##\cup## (or).
Then ##\{x\,\vert \,F\}## is the set of all ##x##, which satisfy ##"false"##. But ##"false"## is never satisfied, thus ##\emptyset##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Mr Davis 97
Mr Davis 97 said:
##A \cup (B-A) = \{x~ |~ x \in A \land (x \in B \land x \not\in A) \}##
To expand on what fresh_42 said, the expression on the right is the definition of ##A \cap (B - A)##; i.e., the intersection of A and B - A, not the union of these two sets.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K