Abstract questions about PDEs with respect to Seperation of Variables

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the separation of variables technique for solving partial differential equations (PDEs), specifically the assumption that solutions can be expressed as U(x,t) = X(x)T(t), where X and T are eigenfunctions. The method involves assuming a solution form, converting the PDE into ordinary differential equations (ODEs) for X and T, and solving these ODEs. While separation of variables is a straightforward approach, it does not always yield a solution, necessitating the exploration of alternative methods when it fails.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of partial differential equations (PDEs)
  • Knowledge of ordinary differential equations (ODEs)
  • Familiarity with eigenfunctions and eigenvalues
  • Basic mathematical techniques for solving differential equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the separation of variables technique in detail
  • Learn about alternative methods for solving PDEs, such as Fourier series and transform methods
  • Explore the conditions under which separation of variables is applicable
  • Practice solving PDEs using separation of variables and compare results with other techniques
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, physics, and engineering who are learning about or working with partial differential equations and seeking effective solution techniques.

trap101
Messages
339
Reaction score
0
I have two more loosely based questions about PDEs and the separation of variables technique:


In the intro of this chapter the author imposed that we "assume" the the solution to a set of special PDEs is:

U(x,t) = X(x)T(t) where X and T are the eigenfunctions. My question is how did they derive that this form would work? I mean working from that equation you see it works, but how did they even conjure up the direction in which to go to arrive at that? This is my first PDE course so maybe that is above my pay grade and I should worry about that after.

The second question was how do I know that separation of variables is the right technique to use when solving a question, if I have other techniques to use?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
trap101 said:
I have two more loosely based questions about PDEs and the separation of variables technique:

In the intro of this chapter the author imposed that we "assume" the the solution to a set of special PDEs is:

U(x,t) = X(x)T(t) where X and T are the eigenfunctions. My question is how did they derive that this form would work? I mean working from that equation you see it works, but how did they even conjure up the direction in which to go to arrive at that? This is my first PDE course so maybe that is above my pay grade and I should worry about that after.

The second question was how do I know that separation of variables is the right technique to use when solving a question, if I have other techniques to use?

Thanks

In fact, most of the time separation of variables doesn't work. But since it does work sometimes, and is relatively simple to do, it is usually worth a try. The thinking is as follows:

(1) Assume there is a solution that meets U(x,t) = X(x)T(t) .
(2) Convert the PDE to ODE's for X and T.
(3) Solve the ODE's for X and T.

If you can simultaneously solve the ODE's for X and T, then U is a solution to the original PDE. If you can't (usually you can't), then separation of variables didn't work and you have to try another method.

There is no general solution for solving PDE's, but a large number of techniques known to work in certain cases.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 93 ·
4
Replies
93
Views
6K