Accelerating electrons giving off radiation

AI Thread Summary
Electrons in a superconducting ring, due to their acceleration, are expected to emit electromagnetic radiation. The Larmor formula is suggested for estimating radiation in non-relativistic cases, while Maxwell's equations may be needed for relativistic scenarios. The acceleration of the electrons is proportional to the square of their acceleration (a²). The discussion indicates that the speed of electrons can vary significantly, impacting radiation emission. Overall, the principles discussed apply more effectively to superconductors than to normal conductors.
granpa
Messages
2,268
Reaction score
7
Since the electrons flowing around a superconducting ring are accelerating they should give off electromagnetic radiation.
Based on this, is there any easy way to estimate the half-life of a supercurrent given the radius of the ring?

even a back of the envelope order of magnitude kind of thing is fine.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think the Larmor formula is what you're looking for (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Larmor_formula). Note, however, it only applies to the non-relativistic case. I think the article shows a basic derivation, you might be able to generalize to the relativistic case; otherwise you'd have to work from maxwell's equations.
 
the electrons in the superconductor are moving slowly arent they?
 
basically its proportianal to a2
a=acceleration
 
granpa said:
the electrons in the superconductor are moving slowly arent they?
It depends on the case; they can be moving essentially arbitrarily fast... depends on the situation.

granpa said:
basically its proportianal to a2
a=acceleration
Absolutely, and that's generally the case (at least for non-relativistic situations).

granpa said:
The only question I have is whether this only applies to isolated charges.
It wouldn't apply well to a normal conductor, but for a superconductor it should be fine.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.
Back
Top