Acceleration And Velocity Problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on confusion regarding the equations of motion, specifically when initial velocity (u) is zero. The equations v = u + at and S = ut + 1/2at^2 are highlighted, with a particular focus on the derived relationships when u equals zero. The user notes a discrepancy between instantaneous velocity (v = at) and average velocity (V = S/t). The key point is that instantaneous velocity is calculated at a specific moment, while average velocity considers total distance over total time. Understanding this distinction clarifies the apparent contradiction in the equations.
varunKanpur
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
I am having a problem in understanding the equation of motions.

The equation of motion are
v=u+at
S=ut +1/2at^2

Velocity= distance/ time=d/t

The problem is that if u=0 then
V=at. Equation.1

S=1/2at^2
V=S/t=1/2at not equal to equation 1

What am I doing wrong??
Thanx
 
Physics news on Phys.org
v = u + a*t gives INSTANTANEOUS velocity at time t.

But, if you use v = s/t you get the AVERAGE velocity.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?

Similar threads

Back
Top