Does a change in direction always result in acceleration?

AI Thread Summary
Velocity is defined as speed in a specific direction, while acceleration is the rate at which velocity changes over time. A change in direction of an object's velocity indicates that acceleration is occurring, even if the speed remains constant. For example, in uniform circular motion, an object experiences centripetal acceleration directed towards the center of the circle, which alters the direction of the velocity vector without changing its magnitude. Therefore, any change in the velocity vector, whether in speed or direction, results in acceleration. Understanding this relationship is crucial in physics.
AbsoluteZer0
Messages
124
Reaction score
1
Hi,

Velocity is defined as speed in a given direction and acceleration is the rate at which velocity changes over time.

Lets say a car is being driven on a road. If the speed changes, then the car is accelerating. Am I able to say that if direction changes, then the car has also accelerated?

Thanks,
 
Physics news on Phys.org
AbsoluteZer0 said:
Hi,

Velocity is defined as speed in a given direction and acceleration is the rate at which velocity changes over time.

Lets say a car is being driven on a road. If the speed changes, then the car is accelerating. Am I able to say that if direction changes, then the car has also accelerated?

Thanks,

Yes.

If the velocity vector is changing, there is an acceleration.

Example: uniform circular motion. For an object moving in a circle at a constant speed, there is a "centripetal" acceleration (an acceleration that points towards the centre of the circle). Since the acceleration is radially inward, whereas the velocity is always tangent to the circle, these two vectors are always perpendicular to each other. For this reason, the acceleration doesn't increase the magnitude of the velocity vector. All it does is rotate the velocity vector.
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top