Acceleration of a frictionless block on a frictionless wedge

  • Thread starter VinnieD
  • Start date
  • #1
3
0

Homework Statement


IMG_0684.JPG

There is no friction between any surfaces mass is known. Find acceleration of the blocks.

Homework Equations


F=ma

The Attempt at a Solution


IMG_0694.JPG


I'm almost certian
Amx=g sin θ
AMy=0
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
231
28
Hmm.... Why wouldn't the acceleration in the x direction be affected by the mass of the objects?
 
  • Like
Likes haruspex
  • #3
TSny
Homework Helper
Gold Member
12,852
3,203
Amx=g sin θ
AMy=0
Yes, these look correct.

Most of your work looks OK to me.

upload_2017-7-6_14-49-9.png


The part x-ed out in red is incorrect, but it doesn't look like you used that part.

Look at your final equation circled in blue. Can you see a substitution that you can make for ##N_m## in this equation that would allow you to solve for the acceleration of the wedge, ##a_{Mx}##?

One of the key equations for this problem is the constraint ##a_{my} = -a_{Mx} \sin \theta## (boxed in green). But I don't see where you showed how you obtained this.
 
  • #4
haruspex
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
34,851
6,119
Amx=g sin θ
That would be true if the wedge were fixed. But imagine if the wedge were not only frictionless but extremely light. The block would be almost in free fall.
 
  • #5
TSny
Homework Helper
Gold Member
12,852
3,203
That would be true if the wedge were fixed. But imagine if the wedge were not only frictionless but extremely light. The block would be almost in free fall.
For the block, the x direction is parallel to the incline. So, free fall acceleration would have an x-component of magnitude g sinθ.
 
  • #6
haruspex
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
34,851
6,119
For the block, the x direction is parallel to the incline. So, free fall acceleration would have an x-component of magnitude g sinθ.
I had not picked up that x was defined as parallel to the slope.
 
  • Like
Likes person123
  • #7
phinds
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Gold Member
2019 Award
16,548
6,906
I had not picked up that x was defined as parallel to the slope.
Nor had I, especially since x is specifically drawn in his solution diagram as being the normal horizontal axis
 
  • #8
TSny
Homework Helper
Gold Member
12,852
3,203
The OP's diagram does show the axes for the block, but they don't stand out. (Waldo axes)
But the x-axis is drawn up the slope, so amx would be negative in this case.
 

Related Threads on Acceleration of a frictionless block on a frictionless wedge

  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
341
Replies
2
Views
18K
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
27
Views
20K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
3K
Top