Acceleration vs Gravity and effect on time/clocks

DarioC
Messages
254
Reaction score
19
Just kicking some things around and this came up:
Albert says that it is not possible to discern acceleration from gravity under his imposed conditions.
Question, does that apply to clock type "devices," and time?

As practical example; let us put a radioactive sample in an ultra-centrifuge and spin it up, monitoring the average radio-active decay rate. Will it be slower?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
DarioC said:
Just kicking some things around and this came up:
Albert says that it is not possible to discern acceleration from gravity under his imposed conditions.
Question, does that apply to clock type "devices," and time?
Yes.

DarioC said:
As practical example; let us put a radioactive sample in an ultra-centrifuge and spin it up, monitoring the average radio-active decay rate. Will it be slower?
Yes. If you click on the sticky thread on experimental basis of SR and search for muon you will find some experiments (Bailey?) about exactly that.
 
DarioC said:
Just kicking some things around and this came up:
Albert says that it is not possible to discern acceleration from gravity under his imposed conditions.
Question, does that apply to clock type "devices," and time?

As practical example; let us put a radioactive sample in an ultra-centrifuge and spin it up, monitoring the average radio-active decay rate. Will it be slower?

While the decay will be slower in the centrifuge, you have to be really careful how you interpret this. The slowing is exactly that which you would expect from time dilation for a clock traveling at the speed of the end of the centrifuge. The acceleration itself does not add any extra time dilation.

This can be shown by using centrifuges with different arm lengths if the speed at the end of the arm is kept constant, the time dilation remains the same, even though the acceleration experienced will be different.

So how do we equate gravity and acceleration when it comes to time dilation? First you have to realize that gravitational time dilation is related to gravitational potential and not gravitational acceleration. If you had a uniform gravity field (one that did not differ in strength with height) and put two clocks in it at different heights, the higher one would run faster compared to the lower even though they feel the same pull of gravity.

With acceleration, this same effect can be shown by having two clocks sitting in the nose and tail of an accelerating spaceship. The clock in the nose willing run faster than the one in the tail, even though they are both accelerating at the same rate.
 
OK, thanks for the references. The one on "clock" velocity vs acceleration was most interesting.
DC
 
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top