Acid-Base Chemistry in Aqueous Solutions

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the final hydrogen ion concentration and pH after mixing 400 mL of 0.2 M NaOH with 150 mL of 0.1 M H3PO4. The initial moles of NaOH and H3PO4 are determined, showing that NaOH is in excess after neutralization. The user is unsure about the next steps, particularly in finding molarities and applying the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation. They are prompted to write the reaction equations for phosphoric acid neutralization and identify the resulting acid-base pair and their concentrations. The conversation emphasizes understanding the neutralization process and the resulting chemical species.
User Name
Messages
19
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



What are the final hydrogen ion concentration and pH of of a solution obtained by mixing 400 mL of 0.2 M NaOH with 150 mL of 0.1 M H3PO4? pKa's are 2.12, 7.21, 12.32

Homework Equations



Henderson-Hasselbach: pH = pKa + log /[a]

The Attempt at a Solution



0.2 M * .400 L = .08 mol NaOH
0.1 M * .150 L = .015 mol H3PO4
.015 mol of NaOH will be converted into H2O.

.08 mol - .015 mol = .065 mol NaOH
.015 mol H3PO4

I'm not 100% sure what to do after this besides find the molarities and continue on in the same methods but with H2O and H2PO4 -?

Am I headed in the right direction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Write THREE consecutive reaction equations that occur during phosphoric acid neutralization. Find out how far the neutralization goes (in terms of limiting reagents). After the neutralization ends, what acid and conjugate base pair is present? What concentrations of both?

--
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top