How Do You Calculate pH and [OH-] for a Mixed NH3 and NH4Cl Solution?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the pH and [OH-] for a mixed NH3 and NH4Cl solution, the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation can be applied, using the pKa derived from the given Kb of NH3. The initial moles of NH3 and NH4Cl are both 0.1 moles after mixing 500ml of 0.20M solutions. The participant calculated pH values of 5.13 using the normal method and 9.25 using the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation, leading to confusion about which method is appropriate. A suggestion was made to solve the full quadratic equation using the ICE table method for more accurate results. Clarification on the correct approach is sought to resolve the discrepancies in pH calculations.
Alex Santos
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement

[/B]
NH3(aq) is a weak base with Kb = 1.8*10-5, Calculate [OH-] in a solution that is made by mixing togeather 500ml of 0.20M NH3(aq) and 500ml of 0.20M NH4CL(aq), what is the value of Ph?

Homework Equations


Henderson Hasselbalch: ph = Pka + log([conj.base/acid])
As well as another approach on the example, the regular one.

The Attempt at a Solution


To start with I am always a bit confused on how to set up the example and giving me the right inital values, for example I have NH4Cl---->NH3 + Cl + H. Now can I use my initial values, as NH3 in terms of moles
moles NH4Cl: 0.5L*0.2M = 0.1 moles
moles NH3: 0.5*0.2M = 0.1moles

using the " normal method" I get PH = 5.13 and by using the Hendersone Hasselbalch I get PH = 9.25.

I will send an attachment of my calculation because I write everything on an Ipad, so you can see clearly what I am doing.
Please correct me and tell me what is wrong and which method is wrong in my case.
Thank you
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
Solve full quadratic for the ICE table method.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top