Acoustic levitation shape question (Japanese scientists link)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the potential for creating more complex shapes through acoustic levitation, specifically questioning the use of a horizontal X shape for levitated particles. It is suggested that with precise control over standing waves, unique 3D shapes or square patterns could be achieved by adjusting the arrangement and number of speakers. The current setup with four speakers creates specific pressure nodes, and altering their phases allows for rotation of the levitated group. Adding more speakers could enhance control and complexity of the acoustic field, enabling the manipulation of heavier objects, although this would require significant acoustic power. The conversation encourages experimentation to explore these possibilities further.
ethereal_int
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
http://sploid.gizmodo.com/amazing-scientists-make-things-fly-around-in-space-usi-1492880964


I wanted to ask is there a specific reason for the completely horizontal X shape of the levitated particles. If we already have such precise control over the standing waves, couldn't it be possible to make more unique shapes?

Like a 3d one with depth (a bigger thickness, or more levels), or a square pattern with 4 walls and an empty center? Or does it have to be a variation of a 2d star because of the orientation of the speakers? Would 2 more speakers give the X 2 more lines? What about a speaker ring or a sphere?
Ultimately that would allow us to control more objects at once independently, and use it in automated construction better.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The patterns visible in the video are caused by the pressure nodes in the acoustic field. It appears there are four speakers that contribute to the total sound field. Then when their driving signals' phases are changed it causes the 4-sided group to rotate. Yes, if you mounted more speakers around the circumference the sound field would be generated with more complex (and potentially more controllable) nodes. I've never heard of a "speaker ring", but many speakers evenly spaced around the center would begin to approximate that. My guess is that yes, that would allow more complex motions of suspended particles. Those little white beads are Styrofoam, the LED, and tiny resistor are all very light weight. Suspending heavier objects would require HUGE amounts of acoustical power. Why not experiment yourself and then come back here to Physics Forums and show us your results?
 
Here is a paper describing the experiment:

"Three-dimensional Mid-air Acoustic Manipulation by Ultrasonic Phased Arrays"
Authors: Yoichi Ochiai, Takayuki Hoshi, Jun Rekimoto
http://arxiv.org/abs/1312.4006
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top