Why is the frequency of 58 kHz used in acousto-magnetic anti-theft systems?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Zilfarion
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Systems
AI Thread Summary
The frequency of 58 kHz in acousto-magnetic anti-theft systems is a standardized choice among manufacturers to ensure compatibility across various tags and detection systems. This standardization allows the detection bars to resonate effectively, facilitating reliable operation. While there is no inherent significance to the frequency itself, it serves as a practical limit for current technology. The discussion also reflects a search for project ideas, indicating a desire for deeper exploration into the topic. Overall, understanding the rationale behind the 58 kHz standard can provide a solid foundation for further research or project development.
Zilfarion
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I was wondering why manufacturers only makes these anti-theft systems send out a frequency of 58 kHz. Is there something that will change in the system if we make the frequency higher or lower? Always been wondering that and if 58 kHz does end up being a limit, then why is it one?

I might use this as a project demonstration we have to do for my college, but I just wanted to make sure that it's of a significance for me to delve deeper into. I already did the basic research on how the EAS works, but this is one thing I haven't found or been able to figure out myself.

Any help would be appreciated and if this doesn't work out, I'll just look for another project to do. Don't have much inspiration at the moment so if you can suggest something to than that will help me out too =3.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That's an interesting technology- I haven't heard of it before. Very clever. Nice choice of topic.

58 kHz is likely a standard, created by the main manufacturers of the detection system. Since the bars have to be resonant with a particular frequency, and there are many different manufacturers of the tag, everyone needs to standardize the design. I don't think there is anything magic about 58 kHz.
 
Hmm, I guess so... Guess I can't really do much about this as a project then, unless I find something else to concentrate on. But I'll still search a bit more until I really can't find anything cause I seriously can't think of another project that I might be able to do. Thanks for the small tidbit of info though
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top