Action-angle coordinates for the spherical pendulum

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving action-angle coordinates for a spherical pendulum using the Hamilton-Jacobi equation. The Hamiltonian is provided, and the participants explore the integration limits for the action variable J_theta, emphasizing that theta cannot take negative values. They clarify that the limits of integration depend on the initial conditions, particularly the relationship between the initial azimuthal velocity and gravitational effects. The conversation concludes with the understanding that the limits of integration for theta will vary based on these initial conditions, which can lead to different values for theta_min and theta_max. Overall, the thread highlights the complexities involved in determining action-angle coordinates for this integrable system.
luisgml_2000
Messages
42
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



To obtain the action angle coordinates por the spherical pendulum.

Homework Equations



<br /> H=\frac{1}{2mh^2}\left(p_\theta^2+\frac{p_\phi^2}{\sin^2\theta}\right)+mgh\cos\theta<br />

<br /> \frac{1}{2mh^2}\left(\left(\frac{\partial G}{\partial \theta}\right)^2+\frac{\left(\frac{\partial G}{\partial\phi}\right)^2}{\sin^2\theta}\right)+mgh\cos\theta=-\frac{\partial G}{\partial t}<br />

<br /> G=-\alpha_1 t+ \alpha_2\phi \pm\int{\sqrt{2mh^2(\alpha_1-mgh\cos\theta)-\frac{\alpha_2^2}{\sin^2\theta}}d\theta}<br />

<br /> p_\phi&amp;=&amp;\alpha_2\\<br /> p_\theta&amp;=&amp; \pm\sqrt{2mh^2(\alpha_1-mgh\cos\theta)-\frac{\alpha_2^2}{\sin^2\theta}}<br />

<br /> J_\phi=\frac{1}{2\pi}\oint p_\phi d\phi=\alpha_2<br />

<br /> J_\theta=\frac{1}{2\pi}\oint p_\theta d\theta=\frac{1}{2\pi}\oint \pm\sqrt{2mh^2(\alpha_1-mgh\cos\theta)-\frac{\alpha_2^2}{\sin^2\theta}} d\theta<br /> <br />

The Attempt at a Solution



The Hamilton-Jacobi equation is separable in these coordinates and hence the calculation of the action coordinates gets simpler. In fact, the action corresponding to \phi is trivial but I cannot evaluate the integral for the other action. Can someone help me out?

By the way somewhere on the Internet I saw that one cannot define action-angle coordinates for this problem but I find that assertion puzzling since this system is an integrable one and because the phase space for it is bounded.

Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I have the same problem, but in my case the integral I express in other way and for small angles, so in my case the integral was from -theta0 to theta0
∫±(1/θ)√(-α+Eθ^2 -mglθ^4)dθ.
So I did a sustitution with y=θ^2, and the integral was the form ∫(1/y)√(-α+Ey-mgly^2)dy, and that integral is in some tables, but I have problem with the limits of these integral, because when I evaluate the integral goes to zero...
I don't know where is the mistake...
 
Zeroxt said:
I have the same problem, but in my case the integral I express in other way and for small angles, so in my case the integral was from -theta0 to theta0
∫±(1/θ)√(-α+Eθ^2 -mglθ^4)dθ.
So I did a sustitution with y=θ^2, and the integral was the form ∫(1/y)√(-α+Ey-mgly^2)dy, and that integral is in some tables, but I have problem with the limits of these integral, because when I evaluate the integral goes to zero...
I don't know where is the mistake...

The limits will not be from ##-\theta_0## to ##\theta_0##. In fact, ##\theta## is always non-negative in spherical coordinates. ##\theta## will vary between some minimum positive value ##\theta_{min}## to some maximum value ##\theta_{max}##. These limits of ##\theta## can be determined by considering what the value of ##p_{\theta}## must be at the limits of ##\theta##.
 
Yes, I did that, I integrate with the substitution and then I come back to the original variable and evaluated the result of integral, but in the result I only have squares variables, so the result of the evaluation is zero.
 
Zeroxt said:
Yes, I did that, I integrate with the substitution and then I come back to the original variable and evaluated the result of integral, but in the result I only have squares variables, so the result of the evaluation is zero.
You stated that your integration range for ##\theta## is from ##-\theta_{0}## to ##\theta_{0}##. But ##\theta## cannot take on negative values.
 
But so, how can I define the limits? Because for action of theta, you have to do a line integral, so you have to integrate in a period... For this I suppose that the limits are -theta0 to theta0... In other case I don't know which are the possible limits
 
When ##\theta## reaches one of its extreme values (limits), what is the value of ##\dot{\theta}##? What does this tell you about the value of ##p_{\theta}## at the limiting values of ##\theta##?
 
I found this value of theta assuming that the velocity in theta (theta dot) was zero and I use the condition of the energy to find these theta. So in this angle the momentum will be zero...
 
OK. The limiting values of ##\theta## will correspond to ##\dot{\theta} = 0##. Since ##p_{\theta}## is proportional to ##\dot{\theta}##, you can find the limiting values of ##\theta## by finding where ##p_{\theta} = 0##. Your integrand for the action variable ##J_{\theta}## represents ##p_{\theta}##. For what values of ##\theta## is the integrand equal to zero?
 
  • #10
In the problem appears that the condition initial is theta0 <<1. So the value of theta that I found is a constant times theta0, this constant can take two possible values depending of the large of the pendulum, g and the velocity initial (w0) in fhi (which is constant too). In case that lw0>g the constant take the value of lw0/g in the other case the value of the constant is 1.
 
  • #11
What are all the specific initial conditions that you are assuming for the problem?
 
  • #12
I write you the problem:
A spherical pendulum it's build with a rod of length, massless and inextensible, which in the extreme of the rod put a punctual mass m under the gravity acceleration. In a initial moment the particle it's shifted an angle theta0 respect to the vertical and it's impulse with a rotational velocity azimutal w0. Using the spherical coordinates determined the action-angles variables and obtain the period of oscillation/libration characteristic of the system in the limit theta0<<1.
 
  • #13
OK. So, the initial conditions may be taken to be ##\theta = \theta_{0}##, ##\dot{\theta} = 0##, ##\phi = 0##, and ##\dot{\phi} = \omega_0##.

If you follow my suggestions earlier, you should be able to find the limits of integration for ##J_{\theta}##. As expected, you should find ##\theta_{min} = \theta_0##. Did you find a value for ##\theta_{max}##?
 
  • #14
I think that I found the angle, because I compute the Energy with the initial condition and then I compute the Energy in the moment when the velocity in theta is zero, so the energies have the same value therefore I found an angle with these condition...
Now I have a doubt, the minimum angle is theta0?
 
  • #15
I shouldn't have said that ##\theta_{min}## is necessarily ##\theta_0##.

##\theta_0## could be either ##\theta_{min}## or ##\theta_{max}## depending on whether or not ##\omega_0## is greater than or less than ##\sqrt{g/l} \equiv \Omega_0##, where ##l## is the pendulum length.

If ##\omega_0 > \Omega_0##, then the pendulum will swing out to larger values of ##\theta##, and ##\theta_0## will be the minimum value of ##\theta## for the motion.
If ##\omega_0 < \Omega_0##, then the pendulum will "fall" to smaller values of ##\theta##, and ##\theta_0## will be the maximum value of ##\theta## for the motion.
If ##\omega_0 = \Omega_0##, then the pendulum mass will move in a horizontal circle so that ##\theta## doesn't change during the motion.
 
  • #16
Yes I found angles in term of these condition that you say, so I have two possible values for theta one of them greater than theta0 and the other equal to theta0...
 
  • #17
OK. One of the limits of integration will be ##\theta_0## and the other limit will be greater than, less than, or equal to ##\theta_0## depending on the initial conditions.
 
  • #18
Okay, thanks you so much for your help, you help me a lot.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K