Action at a Distance: History & Meaning

  • Thread starter Thread starter somy
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
"Action at a distance" refers to the challenge of explaining how masses exert forces on each other without a direct connection, a problem noted by Newton in his Theory of Gravity. Historically, the concept of ether was proposed to address this issue, but it was dismissed in the late 1800s, leading to the introduction of fields, which did not resolve the fundamental question. While exchange particles have been identified for electromagnetic, strong, and weak nuclear forces, gravity remains problematic with various proposed solutions. Critics argue that Einstein's General Relativity does not adequately address the mechanism behind gravitational interactions, merely reformulating the original question. The discussion suggests that action at a distance may be a more straightforward explanation than current field theories.
somy
Messages
137
Reaction score
0
Hi all.
I want to know what do they mean by "action at distance". I know the concept of field(!) and the meaning of "space geometry effects". I wanted to know something about the history of this concept.
Thank you.
Somy :smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Action at a distance is a problem that Newton recognised with his Theory of Gravity. Simply speaking, how does one mass 'know' that another is near it, and so feel the force? How does the moon 'know' that the Earth is where it is? The same goes for electromagnetic forces.

To get round this problem, the concept of the ether was invented - a substance through with the forces could travel. When this was shown to be wrong in the late 1800s, the idea of a Field came about. However, this didn't solve the problem, it just gave it a name!

We know know about exchange particles that can solve the problem for Eletromagnetic, strong and weak nuclear forces, but for Gravity, there is still a problem, albeit with several proposed solutions.
 
Last edited:
Adrian Baker said:
Action at a distance is a problem that Newton recognised with his Theory of Gravity. Simply speaking, how does one mass 'know' that another is near it, and so feel the force? How does the moon 'know' that the Earth is where it is? The same goes for electromagnetic forces.

To get round this problem, the concept of the ether was invented - a substance through with the forces could travel. When this was shown to be wrong in the late 1800s, the idea of a Field came about. However, this didn't solve the problem, it just gave it a name!

We know know about exchange particles that can solve the problem for Eletromagnetic, strong and weak nuclear forces, but for Gravity, there is still a problem, albeit with several proposed solutions.


I think that Einstein GR does not solve the problem of gravitation. In fact one is substituting the old query

"How does the moon 'know' that the Earth is where it is?"

by modern one

How does the moon 'know' that the curvature of spacetime is where it is?

In the same form that Newton equation just compute force and don't answer the mechanism for it. Einstein field equations just compute spacetime curvature (if any) and don't answer the mechanism for it.

Regarding the supposed success explaining of electromagentic force by means of interchange of particles, one may be highly eskeptic.

- The explaining reliy on many asumptions and unobserved facts (virtual particles are newer seen)

- The explaining only work for asymptotic states for free particles. There is not convincing explaining for bounded states.

- The asumption of interchange of particles is inspired in classical EM field theory with retarded LW potentials. It is known that LW retarded potentials are not good enough, by this reason Feynman looked for the use of advanced potentials also.


Action at a distance is more convincing than field theory.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'

Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'

Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
View full post »

Thread 'Do electron density waves accompany EM waves in coaxial cables?'

Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
View full post »

Similar threads

B Lagrangrian and Hamiltonian mechanics: A historical picture
Replies
7
Views
3K
I Action in Lagrangian Mechanics
Replies
5
Views
2K
B Question about Action-Reaction Forces
Replies
8
Views
2K
I Do electromagnetic waves fade with distance in vacuum?
Replies
2
Views
1K
B Vacuum surface area balance and force
Replies
4
Views
1K
I Classical Field Theory - Something isn't clicking
Replies
12
Views
1K
I Uncertainties accumulate when measuring longer lengths?
Replies
7
Views
1K
I Why is the Cross Product Used in Mathematics? Understanding its Role and History
Replies
21
Views
3K
I Chunks of action smaller than Planck's constant
Replies
2
Views
1K
I Effective weight vs distance to the point of attachment of the weight
Replies
11
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top