Actions of Field on Vector Space

WWGD
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Messages
7,679
Reaction score
12,421
Hi, Algebraists:

Say V is finite-dimensional over F . Is there more than one way of defining the
action of F on V (of course, satisfying the vector space axioms.) By different
ways, I mean that the two actions are not equivariant.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
WWGD said:
Hi, Algebraists:

Say V is finite-dimensional over F . Is there more than one way of defining the
action of F on V (of course, satisfying the vector space axioms.) By different
ways, I mean that the two actions are not equivariant.

Thanks.
It depends upon the field F. If F is Q (the field of rationals) or more generally a prime field (i.e. either Q or Z_p for some prome p), then there is only one possible field action of F on V: The vector space axioms determine the value of nv for each natural number n and each v in V, and this can only be extended in one way to Z and then to Q if the axioms shall hold.

But in general, there can be more than one possibility. For example, If V is a vector space over C (the complex numbers), and if a' denotes the conjugate of a complex number a, then we define a new action x of C upon V by a x v = a'v (where a'v is computed by the original action). It can be shown that V with this new action and the same addition as before satisfies the vector space axioms.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
939
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
38
Views
6K
Back
Top