B Adding Fractions: Simplifying ((k/2k+1)+(1/(2k)(2k+2))=((k+1)/(2k+2))

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter PhysicsBoyMan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    fractions
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on simplifying the expression (k / (2k + 1)) + (1 / (2k)(2k + 2)) to show it equals (k + 1) / (2k + 2). Participants express confusion over the correct interpretation of the fractions, debating whether (k / 2k + 1) should be viewed as k / (2k + 1) or as (k / (2k)) + 1. They emphasize the importance of clarity in mathematical notation to avoid misinterpretation. A common denominator can always be found, even with complex variables, which is crucial for simplification. The conversation highlights the need for precise communication in mathematical expressions.
PhysicsBoyMan
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
(k / 2k + 1) + (1 / (2k)(2k+2)) = ((k+1) / (2k+2))

I would like to simplify the left side to prove that these two statements are equal. I'm not sure how to do this. Surely I can't find a common denominator with such complex variables and such? What is a good approach?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
##\frac{1}{3} + \frac{1}{8} = \frac{2}{4}## ? (##k = 1##)
 
PhysicsBoyMan said:
(k / 2k + 1) + (1 / (2k)(2k+2)) = ((k+1) / (2k+2))

I would like to simplify the left side to prove that these two statements are equal. I'm not sure how to do this. Surely I can't find a common denominator with such complex variables and such? What is a good approach?
A good first step would be to explain what (k / 2k + 1) is supposed to mean.

Is it supposed to denote ##\frac{k}{2k + 1}## or is it supposed to denote ##\frac{k}{2k} + 1## ? The latter is what it does denote according to the PEMDAS rules.
 
It is unclear how to interpret your fractions.
(k / 2k + 1) = k / (2k + 1)? Probably what you meant.
(k / 2k + 1) = (k / (2k)) + 1? More logical given the usual operator order (multiplication/division before addition)
(k / 2k + 1) = (k / 2)k + 1 = (k2/2) + 1? That's how a computer would interpret it.

Same thing for (1 / (2k)(2k+2)).
PhysicsBoyMan said:
Surely I can't find a common denominator with such complex variables and such?
You can always find a common denominator. Worst case: take the product of all involved denominators, that always works.
 
Sorry, its (k / (2k + 1)) + (1 / ((2k)(2k+2))
 
Then it is not true in general, see post #2.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...