B Adding Fractions: Simplifying ((k/2k+1)+(1/(2k)(2k+2))=((k+1)/(2k+2))

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter PhysicsBoyMan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    fractions
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on simplifying the expression (k / (2k + 1)) + (1 / (2k)(2k + 2)) to show it equals (k + 1) / (2k + 2). Participants express confusion over the correct interpretation of the fractions, debating whether (k / 2k + 1) should be viewed as k / (2k + 1) or as (k / (2k)) + 1. They emphasize the importance of clarity in mathematical notation to avoid misinterpretation. A common denominator can always be found, even with complex variables, which is crucial for simplification. The conversation highlights the need for precise communication in mathematical expressions.
PhysicsBoyMan
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
(k / 2k + 1) + (1 / (2k)(2k+2)) = ((k+1) / (2k+2))

I would like to simplify the left side to prove that these two statements are equal. I'm not sure how to do this. Surely I can't find a common denominator with such complex variables and such? What is a good approach?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
##\frac{1}{3} + \frac{1}{8} = \frac{2}{4}## ? (##k = 1##)
 
PhysicsBoyMan said:
(k / 2k + 1) + (1 / (2k)(2k+2)) = ((k+1) / (2k+2))

I would like to simplify the left side to prove that these two statements are equal. I'm not sure how to do this. Surely I can't find a common denominator with such complex variables and such? What is a good approach?
A good first step would be to explain what (k / 2k + 1) is supposed to mean.

Is it supposed to denote ##\frac{k}{2k + 1}## or is it supposed to denote ##\frac{k}{2k} + 1## ? The latter is what it does denote according to the PEMDAS rules.
 
It is unclear how to interpret your fractions.
(k / 2k + 1) = k / (2k + 1)? Probably what you meant.
(k / 2k + 1) = (k / (2k)) + 1? More logical given the usual operator order (multiplication/division before addition)
(k / 2k + 1) = (k / 2)k + 1 = (k2/2) + 1? That's how a computer would interpret it.

Same thing for (1 / (2k)(2k+2)).
PhysicsBoyMan said:
Surely I can't find a common denominator with such complex variables and such?
You can always find a common denominator. Worst case: take the product of all involved denominators, that always works.
 
Sorry, its (k / (2k + 1)) + (1 / ((2k)(2k+2))
 
Then it is not true in general, see post #2.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top