ADM Mass for a diagonal metric

  • Thread starter Thread starter praharmitra
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass Metric
praharmitra
Messages
308
Reaction score
1
Given a metric of the form

<br /> ds^2 = A(r) dt^2 + B(r) dr^2 + C(r)^2 (d\theta^2+sin^2\theta d\phi^2 + sin^2\theta sin^2\phi d\psi^2)<br />

I want to find the ADM mass of this black hole. Can anyone help me with the formula, or method to follow?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is it a general metric of that form, or is it a black hole? Are we in 4+1 dimensions? Is it a vacuum solution? I don't know if Birkhoff's theorem applies in 4+1. Are you given the functions A, B, and C explicitly? I don't know if the definition of ADM mass generalizes trivially to 4+1 -- probably it does.
 
bcrowell said:
Is it a general metric of that form, or is it a black hole? Are we in 4+1 dimensions? Is it a vacuum solution? I don't know if Birkhoff's theorem applies in 4+1. Are you given the functions A, B, and C explicitly? I don't know if the definition of ADM mass generalizes trivially to 4+1 -- probably it does.

The metric is a black hole. The exact form of the functions A,B,C are

<br /> A(r) = -h(r)^{-2/3} f(r) \\<br /> B(r) = h(r)^{1/3} f(r)^{-1} \\<br /> C(r) = h(r)^{1/3} r^2 \\<br />
where
<br /> h(r) = 1 + Q/r^2 \\<br /> f(r) = 1 + r^2 + Q - M/r^2<br />
for two constants Q and M.

We are working in 4+1 dimensional Asymptotically AdS Space.

Could you atleast give me the definition of ADM mass in 4 dimensions, I will try and figure out the generalisation.
 
There are some formulas in Wald, on pg 293, though he doesn't derive them, referring readers to the literature.

Unforutunately, they're presented in terms of asymptotically euclidean coordinates in an asymptotically flat space-time, so you'd have to read Wald's section in chapters 10 and 11 to make any sense of the formulas there - which still don't give any of the motivations, really.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...
Back
Top