Advanced/Retarded Eddington-Finkelstein Coordinates and Incident/Outgoing Wave

  • Thread starter Thread starter yicong2011
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Coordinates Wave
yicong2011
Messages
75
Reaction score
0
My professor said that

Advanced Eddington-Finkelstein Coordinates CAN be applied to describe incident wave well, while CANNOT describe outgoing wave.

Conversely, Retarded Eddington-Finkelstein Coordinates CAN be applied to descibe outgoing wave well, while CANNOT describe incident wave well.

I cannnot understand why...

Anyone can help to explain it?

Thanks...


(Neither y professor nor I are native English speakers. Perhaps language jeopardises the understanding..)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Schwarzschild coordinates only cover part of the spacetime (outside r=2m). Both outgoing and incoming waves run off the coordinate patch.

Eddington coordinates cover more of the spacetime, but still not all of it. As you say, advanced coordinates work well for incoming waves, but outgoing waves run off the patch. Likewise for retarded coordinates, outgoing waves are ok but incoming waves run off the patch.

Kruskal coordinates cover the entire spacetime and can be used for both.
 
Bill_K said:
Eddington coordinates cover more of the spacetime, but still not all of it. As you say, advanced coordinates work well for incoming waves, but outgoing waves run off the patch. Likewise for retarded coordinates, outgoing waves are ok but incoming waves run off the patch.
Yes, as discussed here the "maximally extended" version of the spacetime contains both an interior black hole region and a separate interior white hole region, and advanced coordinates contain only the interior black hole region while retarded coordinates containe only the interior white hole region (and neither contains the other exterior region, region III in the diagram in the link). Another aspect of the problem is that in retarded coordinates, particles leaving from the white hole region cross the event horizon into the exterior region at some finite coordinate time, but particles falling in from the event horizon never actually reach it at any finite coordinate time, instead taking an infinite coordinate time to get arbitrarily close to it. In contrast, in advanced coordinates the opposite is true--particles falling in due reach the event horizon at a finite coordinate time, but particles leaving the horizon have been moving away from it for an infinite coordinate time in the past.

From this page, a diagram of advanced coordinates showing world lines both of light rays falling into the horizon and also coming out:

[URL]http://ckw.phys.ncku.edu.tw/public/pub/Notes/TheoreticalPhysics/Lawrie_2/Chap04/4.5.4._EddingtonFinkelsteinCoordinates.files/image001.jpg[/URL]

You can see the ones coming out never actually crossed the event horizon at any point on the diagram, and even if you extended the diagram back to earlier times these light rays would always be slightly outside the event horizon at any time in the past. On the other hand, here's the diagram for retarded coordinates:

[URL]http://ckw.phys.ncku.edu.tw/public/pub/Notes/TheoreticalPhysics/Lawrie_2/Chap04/4.5.4._EddingtonFinkelsteinCoordinates.files/image002.jpg[/URL]

Here you can see light rays crossing the horizon in the outward direction at finite times, but the ones falling in never quite reach it, though they get closer and closer.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Back
Top