Aerodynamic Lift/Kutta-Zhukovsky theorem

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nikitin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theorem
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the formulas for lift (L) and drag (D) in fluid dynamics, specifically in relation to the Kutta-Zhukovsky theorem. The formulas express lift and drag in terms of fluid density, velocity, and characteristic area, which varies based on the object's shape. For bluff bodies like spheres, the characteristic area is the projected area normal to the flow, while for lifting surfaces like wings, it is the planform area. The velocity 'U' refers to the undisturbed fluid velocity parallel to the object's surface. Overall, the conversation aims to clarify these concepts for better comprehension of aerodynamic principles.
Nikitin
Messages
734
Reaction score
27
Hello! My fluid dynamics book doesn't bother explaining this properly, so can somebody please give a short, intuitive (if possible...) explanation to the following 3 formulas concerning lift and drag? And are they only valid for circular, rotating cylinders (magnus effect)?

L = C_L \cdot \frac{1}{2} \rho U^2 \cdot A
D = C_D \cdot \frac{1}{2} \rho U^2 \cdot A
C_L = \pi a \omega / U_{\infty}

I believe my book used Kutta-Zhukovsky's theorem,
L = \Gamma \cdot \rho U_{\infty}
to get the first. The second one I am very confused about, because according to inviscid theory drag is non-existant.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
What is the book's author, title, edition and page numbers.
 
The first two formulas for L and D are standard. The express the values of the actual lift and drag force in terms of the density of the fluid, the velocity of the fluid, and a characteristic area, usually the projected area of the body normal to the fluid flow. When testing various bodies to determine their lift and drag, the actual force values are non-dimensionalized to calculate the lift and drag coefficients, CL and CD, respectively. This is a useful concept, because it allows one to test scale models instead of full size objects. By scaling the fluid velocity using the Reynolds No., one can use the CL and CD values to predict the lift and drag force on a full size aircraft, for instance, using data obtained from a wind tunnel test on a small scale model aircraft.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thanks for the reply.

2 questions:

1) What exactly do you mean by "characteristic area"? What's the characteristic area of an aerofoil and, say, a sphere?
2) "U" is the velocity of the fluid parallel to the surface of the object, right?
 
Nikitin said:
Thanks for the reply.

2 questions:

1) What exactly do you mean by "characteristic area"? What's the characteristic area of an aerofoil and, say, a sphere?
2) "U" is the velocity of the fluid parallel to the surface of the object, right?


1. For bluff bodies, like spheres or bodies of revolution, it usually means the projected area normal to the flow. For lifting surfaces, like plates or wings, the area is usually the planform area, or the area as viewed looking down on the plate or wing.

2. 'U' is the undisturbed fluid velocity.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
OK thanks
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top