Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around the decision-making process regarding pursuing an Aerospace Engineering degree at the University of Illinois (UIUC) versus a Mechanical Engineering degree with an Aerospace concentration at Rutgers University. Participants explore the implications of cost, potential career paths, and family opinions regarding these choices.
Discussion Character
- Debate/contested
- Exploratory
- Conceptual clarification
Main Points Raised
- One participant highlights the significant cost difference between attending Rutgers ($4,000/year) and UIUC ($34,000/year) and questions whether the investment in UIUC is justified for an Aerospace degree.
- Another participant argues that Mechanical Engineering and Aerospace Engineering are closely related, suggesting that a Mechanical degree would not hinder job prospects in aerospace fields.
- A participant shares personal experience, indicating that many mechanical engineers successfully transition into aerospace roles, reinforcing the idea that a Mechanical Engineering background is viable for aerospace careers.
- Concerns are raised about family opinions, particularly a participant's father's negative view of Mechanical Engineering, which is contrasted with the participant's belief in the field's value.
- One participant provides data suggesting that Mechanical Engineers tend to earn higher starting salaries compared to Civil Engineers, which may influence the decision-making process.
- A participant currently pursuing a Mechanical Engineering degree expresses confidence in being accepted into aerospace graduate programs, emphasizing that many programs offer financial support for PhD candidates.
- Advice is given on how to approach discussions with family regarding educational choices, emphasizing personal agency in decision-making.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants express differing opinions on the value of Mechanical Engineering versus Aerospace Engineering, with some supporting the idea that a Mechanical degree is sufficient for aerospace careers, while others highlight family biases against Mechanical Engineering. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best path forward for the original poster.
Contextual Notes
Participants reference personal experiences and external data to support their claims, but there are no definitive conclusions drawn about the best educational path. The discussion reflects a variety of perspectives influenced by personal circumstances and family opinions.