Programs After obtaining a degree in math

  • Thread starter Thread starter starchild75
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Degree
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether individuals with an undergraduate degree in mathematics should be able to tackle problems from Algebra 1 through Calculus 3. It is generally agreed that a solid understanding of these foundational topics is essential for a math degree. However, participants acknowledge that not all calculus problems can be solved immediately, emphasizing that the complexity of questions and the context in which they are asked play significant roles in problem-solving ability. While one should be capable of addressing problems from standard introductory textbooks in calculus and linear algebra, it's recognized that mastery does not equate to being able to solve every problem instantly. Understanding the concepts and having a general approach to solutions is deemed more important than solving every problem correctly.
starchild75
Messages
100
Reaction score
1
should you be able to tackle any problem Algebra 1 thru calculus 3?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you talking about an undergraduate degree in maths? Then, yes, one should be able to tackle algebra and calculus problems, as these are the foundations of a maths degree! That said, there's almost certainly some calculus questions you could ask me that I, for one, wouldn't be able to answer straight away, so I hope this thread won't turn into a "challenge!"
 
I was referring to a bachelors. But the question could apply to masters as well.
 
It depends on two things really, one is the manner in which you ask the question and the other is the depth of the question. There are many things about elementary topics that you'd never be taught in any class that was required for your undergrad math degree. Math has existed for a long time and people haven't gotten exponentially smarter to keep up with the advances. Some pretty smart people were looking at problems one might consider elementary today; if they had trouble there why wouldn't you? There are some not so subtle nuances here: the fact is that you can look at a problem with hindsight, that makes it easier, but I think you get my point.

My guess is that if you've truly learned something from your undergrad work you should at the least be able to do any problem in any widely used introductory textbook of calculus or linear algebra. I say this as an undergrad myself, so perhaps you should wait for someone wiser to post.
 
Hm I wouldn't say you should be able to solve every problem you see, but you should at least have a very good idea on how to solve it and be able to understand the solution and have a general idea of what the solution will be.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Back
Top