B After the last collider, there is still UHECR

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter Astronuc
  • Start date Start date
Astronuc
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
22,340
Reaction score
7,138
After the last collider has finished, rare, ultra-energetic cosmic rays will continue revealing the Universe’s secrets.
https://bigthink.com/starts-with-a-bang/particle-physics-continue-last-collider/

In May of 2021, the second most energetic cosmic ray ever detected struck Earth, producing a shower of particles detected on the ground by the Telescope Array Collaboration. These particles achieve energies more than a million times greater than the maximum LHC energy, such that after humanity has built our last collider, the energy frontier will still be accessible from space, albeit extremely rarely.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultra-high-energy_cosmic_ray

he first observation of a cosmic ray particle with an energy exceeding 1.0×1020 eV (16 J) was made by John Linsley and Livio Scarsi at the Volcano Ranch experiment in New Mexico in 1962.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultra...ay#Ultra-high-energy_cosmic_ray_observatories

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oh-My-God_particle
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes DeBangis21, sbrothy, berkeman and 1 other person
Physics news on Phys.org
Good point. I guess that's the closest we'll get to a space-collider in the near future...
 
The LHC detectors start just centimeters away from the collision point (millimeters for LHCb). They can get momentum measurements of all decay products, particle identification, measure decay lengths, and more. They can study once-in-a-trillion collision products because they have quadrillions of collisions.

Cosmic rays don't get you any of that information because your detector is tens of kilometers away and high energy particles are way too rare to look for rare processes. They are interesting to study the universe, but they can't do the job of accelerators.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top