Age Impact on Academic Career: German Study & PhD at 30+

  • Context: Studying 
  • Thread starter Thread starter MedLam
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Age Matter
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the impact of age on academic careers, particularly in the context of pursuing a PhD in fields like physics and engineering. Participants explore concerns about starting a PhD later in life, the implications for academic positions, and the perceived advantages or disadvantages of age in academia.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses concern about being too old to pursue a PhD, suggesting they may be 30 or 31 upon completion and questioning how this might affect their academic career and job prospects.
  • Some participants argue that age may not significantly impact the ability to secure academic positions, noting that maturity and life experience can be advantageous.
  • There is a discussion about the average age of PhD completion, with one participant initially claiming that most people finish by 25 or 26, later retracting this based on further research.
  • Another participant mentions that the time required to complete a PhD has increased over the years, with many now finishing around 28-29 years old.
  • Concerns are raised about the physical demands of studying as one ages, with some suggesting that older students may need to manage their health more carefully than younger peers.
  • Several participants note that age is generally not a factor in graduate school applications, particularly in the US, and that taking a few extra years to complete a degree is often not noticeable.
  • There is a suggestion that the quality of work and research output is more important than the age at which one graduates.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the significance of age in academic careers, with no clear consensus on whether being older or younger is more beneficial. Some believe that age can provide advantages, while others focus on the potential drawbacks of starting a PhD later.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference different educational systems and their requirements, noting that these can vary significantly by country. There is also mention of changing trends in the duration of PhD programs over time.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals considering pursuing a PhD later in life, those interested in academic career paths, and students navigating the complexities of graduate school applications may find this discussion relevant.

MedLam
Messages
30
Reaction score
1
I am 18, I am going to be studying German in Germany for 10 months, and then go to a preparatory year (German studienkolleg) I will probably be 20 or 21 before I start actually studying in the university ( although I finished high school at 17 and got accepted in my home country's university, but it sucks, Germany is my only hope ) considering that I am really good at math and physics, and all I will be doing those 2-3 years is study ameliorate my level, will I be too old when I finally get a PhD? Knowing that I want to go to academics and do research, I may be 30 or 31 by the time I finish my PhD, which is the time that most physicist do their most notable work, how will it impact my career? and my chances of finding a position in a good university. Especially that some people get their PhD very young, and most people at 25 or 26. Also, will my brain work the same way? some people may say do something because you love it, but if I am going to do something I love without the hope of ever achieving anything or advancing the field, or even effecting it, then I don't think I can do it.
Also, is there no way I can make the period shorter? This is just not letting me think straight, I am starting to think of changing my plans to Engineering or Medicine ..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You will be too young to apply for a permanet position, most likely. And students won't realize if you are a student or a professor.
 
Asteropaeus said:
You will be too young to apply for a permanet position, most likely. And students won't realize if you are a student or a professor.
Yes, but I will have to apply for a postdoc, which would only make me older .. I like the student or professor thing though.
 
Most people get a PhD at 25 or 26? Where are you getting this statistic?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Wadih Hanache and Delong
Dishsoap said:
Most people get a PhD at 25 or 26? Where are you getting this statistic?
Now that I looked it up, I realized it is wrong, I assumed that based on research I have done about Nobel prize winners. But doesn't that actually mean there's a correlation? the people that are doing really good are the people that are graduating young ( or it may be that the reason they are graduating young is because they are good ) ..
 
MedLam said:
Now that I looked it up, I realized it is wrong, I assumed that based on research I have done about Nobel prize winners.

The situation is very different today. Things have changed in the past past 100 years and it now takes quite a bit longer to get a PhD than it used to.
Also, different countries have different systems. Here in the UK it used to be possible (just a few years ago) to -in theory- get a PhD after six years (3 years for a BSc and then 3 years as a PhD student). Now most CDTs will require you to have a MSc or equivalent before they accept you and then the CDT program itself is 4 years; so the total time is now about 8 years.
In Sweden where I studied you needed a 4.5 year MSc and then the PhD itself was 4+1 years (the PhD itself was in theory 4 years, but you also spent 20% of your time teaching so 5 years in total)

Anyway, the point is that most people will be about 28-29 years old when they finish. It is not a race and you can't really shorted the duration of your PhD; if you are good you will simply do better work and publish more/better papers.
 
MedLam said:
( or it may be that the reason they are graduating young is because they are good )
This.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delong
"Delaying" entry into a university program for a few years is not going to make any difference to your academic career in the long run. In fact, just based on personal observations, having a couple of extra years of maturity and life experience can often be a major advantage in university.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delong
Someone told me once that it's the slope of the line that matters more than it's placement on the "time" axis.

I.e. whatever your age is, just don't waste time in school - especially grad school. People can sit aimlessly for awhile, especially when completing their dissertation.

-Dave K
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Dishsoap and Logical Dog
  • #10
Does age matter? The younger you are, the less likely you'll keel over in your sleep. So, probably.

Does it matter what age you graduate from school? Since you can't finish if you're dead, probably.

Is there a difference between graduating at 26 or 30? At least not in the US - assuming you're still alive. There are age discrimination laws on the books (As if you'd need them at 30, I'll be closer to 40 when I finish.) There are other minor concerns; such as, can you work long enough to retire comfortably, assuming a later start date in the workforce and less time to build up a retirement nest egg.

You're not from the US, so I don't know about what protections Germany or wherever you're from offers, but graduating four years later at 30? Come on. o_O
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delong
  • #11
If you do your undergrad in the US and start grad school there right after completing your undergrad, you will usually be about 27-28 when you finish your PhD. Most people I know started straight from undergrad, but some people took a few years in between. So that being said, it would not be very noticeable if you graduated at age 30 or 31 having taken 5-6 years to complete your PhD.
 
  • #12
radium said:
If you do your undergrad in the US and start grad school there right after completing your undergrad, you will usually be about 27-28 when you finish your PhD. Most people I know started straight from undergrad, but some people took a few years in between. So that being said, it would not be very noticeable if you graduated at age 30 or 31 having taken 5-6 years to complete your PhD.
How about germany? What if I do my undergrad in Germany in a university ranked 13th in physics, I will be probably be 23 or 24 when I apply for grad school, I may want to go to the UK or the US, will age effect my chances of gettig into a top tier school? Can I skip masters?
 
  • #13
MedLam said:
How about germany? What if I do my undergrad in Germany in a university ranked 13th in physics, I will be probably be 23 or 24 when I apply for grad school, I may want to go to the UK or the US, will age effect my chances of gettig into a top tier school? Can I skip masters?

I don't even think age is part of any application in the US, at least I can't remember it being on any I filled out.

Regardless, I can't see why'd it matter.
 
  • #14
MedLam said:
How about germany? What if I do my undergrad in Germany in a university ranked 13th in physics, I will be probably be 23 or 24 when I apply for grad school, I may want to go to the UK or the US, will age effect my chances of gettig into a top tier school? Can I skip masters?

Most places in the UK will require you to have completed a MSc or equivalent.. 23-24 would be the normal age for starting a PhD in the UK (nowadays quite a few people take a gap year etc so many are 1-2 years older).
 
  • #15
I mean, look around on this forum and you'll find people in their 40s and 50s asking if it's too late. But taking just a few extra years? Not even a question, it's likely no one will even notice the difference (although I do know grad students that are frustrated being thrown in with "babies").
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Dr. Courtney and Delong
  • #16
Choppy said:
"Having a couple of extra years of maturity and life experience can often be a major advantage in university.

This is righteous. You will probably become a better student as you get older.
 
  • #17
do we get dumber when we get older? I think we get wiser and smarter from what I've seen
 
  • #18
Bipolar Demon said:
do we get dumber when we get older? I think we get wiser and smarter from what I've seen

Yes, but I believe that what happens (what happened to me anyway) is that you have to pay more attention to your physical health as you get older. The (younger) students I worked with had more physical energy so were able to study longer, sleep less, and eat less. They could also get away with eating poorer diets.. pizza, ramen, whatever.

To "keep up" I realized that what I had to do was not try to study more, but to get more exercise and pack my food!

-Dave K
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Logical Dog
  • #19
I was 24 when I started, and I had to start from behind normal university students. I'm now in a good school studying physics and doing research in astrophysics. I'll be 36 before I get a PhD, but literally nobody will care.

You're good dude.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Logical Dog

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K