# Air flow velocity - big to small and vice versa

• Mark Tamblyn
In summary, the increased flow rate from dual pipes is based on increased pressure (due to combustion) and gas volume.
Mark Tamblyn
Hi there,

prob a simple question for you physics gurus, but this application is for a race car, and question relates to air flow velocity through a pipe, in particular exhaust and intake.

Now, my thinking for the exhaust (push) is that by going from a small diameter to a large diameter will create a vacuum/vortex, i.e. going from a high pressure to a low pressure, therefore sucking the exhaust gases out. was thinking of having the mid section of the exhaust 2.5", and the tail section 3".

Same principle with the intake, but in reverse, as I need air velocity to increase, hence going from large diameter to small diameter, remembering though this is a suck.

Its the exhaust scavenging affect.

I did some quick calcs

Engine capacity - 5948cc @ 7,000rpm = 116.7 rps
Exhaust is every 2nd revolution therefore = 58.35 rps
5948 x 58.35/sec = 347L/sec of gas vol/velocity

the 2.5" pipe has 12672cc (12.7L) of volume per 1 m
the 3" pipe has 18249cc (18.2L) of volume per 1m

I guesstimated length of pipes to be 3.5m x 2 (dual pipes).

The variables are the header design, mufflers and catalytic converters.

This may or may not help with my question about the theory of going from small pipe to big pipe (vice versa) to increase gas scavenging

Any theories?

Thanks, Mark

Last edited by a moderator:
I also calculated flow rate using on-line calculator

2.5" pipe = 109.5 m/sec. Theoretically would take a gas particle 0.032 secs to exit the 3.5m pipe
3" pipe = 76.09 m/sec. Theoretically would take a gas particle 0.046 secs to exit the 3.5m pipe

Counterintuitively, if you add an exhaust diffuser (going from a smaller diameter to a larger diameter pipe), the pressure will actually increase as the flow slows down. However, far and away, I'd expect the largest impact the exhaust would have would be based on flow losses in the pipe, and in this aspect, larger will always be better. I suspect running a smaller pipe would rob you of power, no matter what you do with it downstream. Also, you'd obviously want the least restrictive cat and muffler possible.

Finally, your diameters sound way too small (which you can probably guess already, based on the fact that 1300L/s would be more than 400m/s through your proposed 2.5" pipe). A 6L race engine at 7000RPM should easily be making 550-600hp, if not more. For that kind of power, you'll want a minimum of a 4" diameter single pipe, or 3" duals.

Asymptotic
Thanks cjl,
Good point about the EGT and increase in pressure. I didn't think about that.

Another stuff up in my calcs is didn't factor in dual pipe set-up, my calcs are for a single pipe, so the flow rate could be halved. Of course due to V8 design the 2 banks work independently of each other (well wrt exhaust), so may make calcs easier to theorise. Also forgot to mention I have an x-pipe that joins the 2 banks. I do currently have high flow cats and muffs. I currently have dual 2.5" mandrel bend that is on a 347ci (5.6L) race motor, and feel this is fine for this application.

I was thinking of running a dual 3", and have asked on racing forums for their opinion. Its a mixed response, most going bigger is better, some make a good point that the dual high flowing 2.5" is fine. Another consideration is extra weight and clearance the 3" will bring.

Anyway, I posted this on the physics forums to get a more scientific way of looking at it, rather than a petrol head, and remembering main question is about pipe flow dynamics - going from small to big will act as a scavenging effect, much like how headers/extractors work, which incidentally each pipe is a tuned length design, that exit into a larger pipe (collector), out through into the main exhaust. They work by scavenging (sucking out) the exhaust gases. It has been tested that running no pipes loses power. Even those drag cars with pipes just exited the motor are tune length and there is a science behind the length, and race teams hold this testing secretively. Another example of scavenging effect is the expansion pipe on a 2-stroke. As we know 2 stroke are inefficient in removing burnt gases (why atrocious at emissions, that plus burning oil), so an expansion pipe (often seen on those bloody mopeds), helps in sucking the exhaust gases out.

Anyway, my first coffee for the morning has just kicked in.

## What is air flow velocity?

Air flow velocity refers to the speed at which air molecules move through a given space. It is typically measured in units of meters per second (m/s) or feet per minute (ft/min).

## How does air flow velocity change from big to small?

In general, as the space through which air flows becomes smaller, the velocity of the air will increase. This is due to the principle of continuity, which states that the volume of air passing through any given point in a system must remain constant. When the space becomes smaller, the same volume of air must pass through it in a shorter amount of time, resulting in an increase in velocity.

## What factors can affect air flow velocity?

There are several factors that can affect air flow velocity, including the size and shape of the space through which the air is flowing, the temperature and pressure of the air, and any obstacles or obstructions in the air flow path.

## What is the relationship between air flow velocity and air pressure?

The relationship between air flow velocity and air pressure is known as Bernoulli's principle. This principle states that as the velocity of a fluid (such as air) increases, its pressure decreases. This is why air moving through a smaller space will have a lower pressure than air moving through a larger space.

## Can air flow velocity be measured?

Yes, air flow velocity can be measured using various instruments such as an anemometer or a pitot tube. These instruments measure the speed of the air flow and can provide accurate readings of air flow velocity in a given space.

• Aerospace Engineering
Replies
10
Views
1K
• Mechanics
Replies
11
Views
2K
• Mechanics
Replies
4
Views
2K
• Aerospace Engineering
Replies
23
Views
5K
• Chemistry
Replies
16
Views
3K
• Mechanical Engineering
Replies
2
Views
1K
• Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
3K
• Mechanical Engineering
Replies
9
Views
2K
• Mechanics
Replies
1
Views
2K
• Electromagnetism
Replies
9
Views
2K