Air tightness vs Water tighness

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter thierry2506
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Air Water
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the sealing performance of a device under vacuum and pressure conditions, specifically comparing water tightness and air tightness. Participants explore the physics behind these phenomena, including the implications of molecular size, viscosity, and the effects of pressure differentials on sealing effectiveness.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that their tests show the device is water sealed but not air sealed, questioning if there is a physics law that relates water sealing performance at 0.5 bars to lower air sealing performance.
  • Another participant suggests that the viscosity of water might prevent it from entering the container.
  • It is mentioned that water molecules are larger than air molecules, with a follow-up questioning the size comparison between O2 and H2O.
  • A participant speculates that water vapor could pass through gaps and suggests that oiling or waxing the interior of the vacuum vessel could improve air tightness.
  • One hypothesis presented is that capillary action could explain why a vessel is watertight but not airtight, proposing an experiment involving surfactants to test this idea.
  • Another participant discusses the effects of hydrogen bonding in water, suggesting that it leads to larger effective sizes of water clusters and increased viscosity, which may impact sealing performance.
  • It is noted that vacuum tests and pressure tests are not equivalent due to various factors affecting sealing, including the design of mating surfaces and the nature of the seals used.
  • A participant highlights that the maximum pressure differential in a vacuum test is limited compared to pressure tests, which can exceed atmospheric pressure.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the reasons behind the observed sealing performance, with no consensus reached on the underlying physics or the effectiveness of proposed solutions.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention various factors that could influence sealing performance, such as molecular size, viscosity, surface tension, and the design of sealing materials, but these factors remain unresolved and are subject to further exploration.

thierry2506
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I am currently making test under vacuum and pressure to define sealing performance of a device. Test are made at +/- 0.5 bars.

The result I find is that the device tested is water sealed but not air sealed.

Is there any physics law showing that a water sealing performance at 0.5 bars will have an air equivalent sealing performance much lower ?

Why a sealing performanc vacuum test, weither made under water or air is more severe than a pressure test ?

Hope somebody can help !
Regards
Thierry


:frown:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is it possible that the viscosity of the water is preventing the water from getting into the container?
 
water molecules are simply larger than air molecules.
And what do you mean +/- 0.5 bar? 0.5 bar is approximately 0.5atm, which is by no means a strong vacuum
 
jasc15 said:
water molecules are simply larger than air molecules.

Really? I would have guessed that O2 and H2O would be similar in size. But the H2O would be more polar.
 
Well, I'm pretty sure that water vapor would also get through the gaps just fine.

I expect that if you oil or wax the interor of your vacuum vessel, it's going to be much more airtight as well.

I think (and this is just wild speculation, really) that the primary reason that the a vessel is watertight, but not air tight (and other gasses) is capilary action: Consider that the gaps are very narrow, which means that the capilary effect is very strong, and, simultaneously, that the force due to pressure difference is very small. Depending on what you're doing, you might be able to test this hypothesis by adding a surfactant to the water, and seeing if the vessel is still watertight.
 
\int\mbox{What's a surfactant?}dx
 
actionintegral said:
\int\mbox{What's a surfactant?}dx

A surfactant is something that breaks up surface tension. The most familiar example is soap.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surfactant
 
Viscosity and size are both the problem. Water does not exist as H2O but as a much larger collection of water molecules. This is why water has a much higer boiling point that a molecule of that weight would suggest. This is caused by hydrogen bonding between water molucules. Because they are stuck together in groups the material is also more viscous than you would expect. This makes the practical size of the molecule much bigger. It may also have to do with polarity and "sticking" to the walls of the sealing material (this is just a guess).

A vacuum test and a pressure test are not equivilent even under the same pressure differentials. There are many factors that effect the sealing between two surfaces, the least of which is the gasket. The design of the mating surfaces are paramount. There are many surfaces that are designed to leak in one direction but not the other. Pump seals are a prime example. Some of them are designed to allow a small amount of liquid (gas) to be sucked into the pump but nothing out. This assures that a leak is controlled in certain manner.

Also remember that the highest delta P you can get from a vacuum test is 1 ATM while a pressure test can go much higher.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K