How Does Alexander-Whitney Duality Relate to Natural Transformations?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter wofsy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Duality
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the Alexander-Whitney duality, specifically the Alexander-Whitney map, which is a natural transformation between the singular chain complexes of topological spaces. The mapping is defined as (X, Y) → Sing(X × Y) and Sing(X) ⊗ Sing(Y), where Sing denotes the total singular chain complex. The conversation also touches on the relationship between natural transformations and dualities, emphasizing that dualities are often represented as contravariant functors, with a natural transformation typically providing an isomorphism from an object to the dual of its dual.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of topological spaces
  • Familiarity with singular chain complexes
  • Knowledge of natural transformations in category theory
  • Basic concepts of duality in mathematics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of the Alexander-Whitney map in algebraic topology
  • Study the concept of natural transformations in category theory
  • Explore contravariant functors and their applications
  • Investigate the implications of duality in various mathematical contexts
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, particularly those specializing in algebraic topology and category theory, as well as students seeking to deepen their understanding of natural transformations and dualities.

wofsy
Messages
724
Reaction score
0
What is Alexander-Whitney duality?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's not a common term, but I assume you are really referring to the Alexander-Whitney map.

If X, Y are topological spaces, then the AW map is the natural transformation between:

(X, Y) \mapsto Sing (X \times Y) and Sing (X) \otimes Sing (Y)

Where Sing is total singular chain complex for the specified top. space.

Since it's a http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_transformation" , it could be labeled a duality.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
whybother said:
Since it's a http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_transformation" , it could be labeled a duality.
At the risk of derailing the thread... how? :confused: Dualities are typically expressible as contravariant functors -- the closest "natural transformation" gets to the notion of duality is there is typically a natural transformation (usually isomorphism) from an object to the dual of its dual.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
9K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
5K