Algebra/Trignometry based Physics textbooks

  • Thread starter Thread starter rakrobn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics Textbooks
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the challenges of selecting an appropriate physics textbook for independent study, particularly for General Physics I and II. The original poster expresses frustration with textbooks that do not adequately bridge the gap between conceptual understanding and problem-solving, noting that many end-of-chapter problems are significantly more difficult than the examples provided. A key question raised is whether a solid understanding of physics can be achieved without calculus, with the consensus leaning towards the necessity of calculus for true comprehension. The belief is that without calculus, physics problems may feel artificial and lack depth. Several textbooks are mentioned for both algebra/trigonometry-based and calculus-based physics, with a strong recommendation for Halliday, Resnick, and Walker's series for calculus-based courses. The discussion emphasizes the importance of selecting a textbook that facilitates independent learning and effectively prepares students for problem-solving in physics.
rakrobn
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
Hello, I've been looking through several posts, but its hard to get a consensus answer. I will be taking General Physics I and II next year. I don't know yet whether I will be taking it in the calculus-based or non-calculus based version.

I am looking for a textbook in which I can truly rely on with respect to learning concepts and being able to solve chapter problems through independent study as the professors at my university are, unfortunately, not interested in teaching.

In looking at many textbooks, the main issue I have is that the chapter is not helpful in solving the end-of-chapter problems. For example, many times I notice the chapter has quite easy example problems in demonstrating points, yet at the end of the chapter, I notice the sudden high difficulty in the problem sets that by using the chapter alone would be extremely difficult to solve. I understand that Physics is not just a plug-and-chug science, yet even in looking at Amazon reviews, I notice the same complaint.

My first question is: Can a person truly understand physics and apply equations to problems without using calculus or is algebra and trigonometry suffice to learn it? I hear the reason why calculus is needed is to know how the formula is derived, with the other option being memorizing it and accepting it as true.

My second question is what textbook below is best with respect to independent study alone. Here is a listing below that I could find on Amazon. If you know of any other textbook that is good for independent study, please let me know thanks.

Algebra/Trignometry based Physics:
  • College Physics by Alan Giambattista, Betty Richardson, Robert C. Richardson
  • Physics: Principles with Applications by Douglas C. Giancoli
  • College Physics: A Strategic Approach by Randall D. Knight, Brian Jones, Stuart Field
  • Physics by James S. Walker
  • College Physics by Hugh D. Young, Robert Geller
  • College Physics by Jerry D Wilson, Anthony J Buffa, Bo Lou
  • College Physics by Raymond A. Serway, Jerry S. Faughn, and Chris Vuille
  • Physics by John D. Cutnell and Kenneth W. Johnson
  • Conceptual Physics by Paul G. Hewitt
Calculus based Physics:
  • Physics for Scientists & Engineers by Douglas C. Giancoli
  • University Physics with Modern Physics by Hugh D. Young, Roger A. Freedman
  • Essential University Physics by Richard Wolfson
  • The Feynman Lectures on Physics, The Definitive and Extended Edition, 2nd Edition by Richard P. Feynman, Robert B. Leighton, Matthew Sands
  • Physics for Scientists and Engineers by Paul Fishbane, Stephen Gasiorowicz, Steve Thornton
  • Physics for Scientists and Engineers by Paul A. Tipler
  • Principles of Physics: A Calculus-Based Text by Raymond A. Serway, John W. Jewett
  • University Physics by Francis W. Sears, Mark W. Zemansky, and Hugh D. Young
  • College Physics by Francis W. Sears, Mark W. Zemansky, Hugh D. Young
  • Physics, 5th Edition, by David Halliday, Robert Resnick, Kenneth S. Krane
  • Fundamentals of Physics by David Halliday, Robert Resnick, Jearl Walker
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think most people on these forums will agree that Halliday, Resnick, Walker is the way to go for calc-based general physics.

"My first question is: Can a person truly understand physics and apply equations to problems without using calculus or is algebra and trigonometry suffice to learn it? I hear the reason why calculus is needed is to know how the formula is derived, with the other option being memorizing it and accepting it as true."

No, in my opinion, a person cannot truly understand physics without calculus. Calculus-less physics is just artificial problems for those who don't know calculus.
 
i am self learning physics. have you ever worked your way backwards again after finishing most undergrad courses? i have textbooks for junior/senior physics courses in classical mechanics, electrodynamics, thermal physics, quantum mechanics, and mathematical methods for self learning. i have the Halliday Resnick sophomore book. working backwards, i checked out Conceptual Physics 11th edition by Hewitt and found this book very helpful. What i liked most was how stimulating the pictures...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
10K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
12K