Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
- 3,920
- 48
On page 333 in Section 52: The Fundamental Group (Topology by Munkres) Munkres writes: (see attachement giving Munkres pages 333-334)
"Suppose that h: X \rightarrow Y is a continuous map that carries the point x_0 of X to the point y_0 of Y.
We denote this fact by writing:
h: ( X, x_0) \rightarrow (Y, y_0)
If f is a loop in X based at x_0 , then the composite h \circ f : I \rightarrow Y is a loop in Y based at y_0"
I am confused as to how this works ... can someone help with the formal mechanics of this.
To illustrate my confusion, consider the following ( see my diagram and text in atttachment "Diagram ..." )
Consider a point i^' \in [0, 1] that is mapped by f into x^' i.e. f( i^{'} ) = x^'
Then we would imagine that i^' is mapped by h \circ f into some corresponding point y^' ( see my diagram and text in atttachment "Diagram ..." )
i.e. h \circ f (i^{'} ) = y^'
BUT
h \circ f (i^{'} ) = h(f(i^{'} )) = h(x^{'} )
But (see above) we only know of h that it maps x_0 into y_0? {seems to me that is not all we need to know about h?}
Can anyone please clarify this situation - preferably formally and explicitly?
Peter
"Suppose that h: X \rightarrow Y is a continuous map that carries the point x_0 of X to the point y_0 of Y.
We denote this fact by writing:
h: ( X, x_0) \rightarrow (Y, y_0)
If f is a loop in X based at x_0 , then the composite h \circ f : I \rightarrow Y is a loop in Y based at y_0"
I am confused as to how this works ... can someone help with the formal mechanics of this.
To illustrate my confusion, consider the following ( see my diagram and text in atttachment "Diagram ..." )
Consider a point i^' \in [0, 1] that is mapped by f into x^' i.e. f( i^{'} ) = x^'
Then we would imagine that i^' is mapped by h \circ f into some corresponding point y^' ( see my diagram and text in atttachment "Diagram ..." )
i.e. h \circ f (i^{'} ) = y^'
BUT
h \circ f (i^{'} ) = h(f(i^{'} )) = h(x^{'} )
But (see above) we only know of h that it maps x_0 into y_0? {seems to me that is not all we need to know about h?}
Can anyone please clarify this situation - preferably formally and explicitly?
Peter
Attachments
Last edited: