Align* environment inside tabbing environment?

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Ackbach
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the incompatibility of the align* environment within a tabbing environment in LaTeX. Users found that while the alignat* environment did not resolve the issue, the aligned environment worked effectively when properly adjusted. The amsmath package documentation clarifies that certain multi-equation environments are designed to occupy the full line width, which restricts their use within other environments. The final working code provided demonstrates a successful implementation of the aligned environment within a tabbing structure.

PREREQUISITES
  • Familiarity with LaTeX typesetting
  • Understanding of the amsmath package
  • Knowledge of multi-equation environments in LaTeX
  • Experience with the tabbing environment
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the amsmath package documentation for advanced features
  • Learn about the differences between align*, alignat*, and aligned environments
  • Investigate how to effectively use the tabbing environment in LaTeX
  • Practice creating complex equations using nested environments in LaTeX
USEFUL FOR

LaTeX users, mathematicians, and academic writers who need to format complex equations and alignments in their documents.

Ackbach
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,148
Reaction score
94
Why doesn't this code work?

Code:
\begin{tabbing}\qquad \= 11.\quad \= 
\kill

\>1.\>
\begin{align*}
f(x)&=2x+4\\
a&=3\\
\end{align*}
\\
\end{tabbing}

Is it not allowed to put an align* environment inside a tabbing environment?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ackbach said:
Why doesn't this code work?

Code:
\begin{tabbing}\qquad \= 11.\quad \= 
\kill

\>1.\>
\begin{align*}
f(x)&=2x+4\\
a&=3\\
\end{align*}
\\
\end{tabbing}

Is it not allowed to put an align* environment inside a tabbing environment?
Have you tried \alignat* ?
 
\begin{tabbing}\qquad \= 11.\quad \=
\kill

\>1.\>
\begin{alignat*}{1}
f(x)&=2x+4\\
a&=3\\
\end{alignat*}
\\
\end{tabbing}

The alignat* environment didn't work any better than align*, so far as I can see.
 
Here is a quote from the User's Guide for the amsmath Package.

Like equation, the multi-equation environments gather, align, and alignat are designed to produce a structure whose width is the full line width. This means, for example, that one cannot readily add parentheses around the entire structure. But variants gathered, aligned, and alignedat are provided whose total width is the actual width of the contents; thus they can be used as a component in a containing expression.

In my test, the environment aligned worked.
 
Evgeny.Makarov said:
Here is a quote from the User's Guide for the amsmath Package.
Like equation, the multi-equation environments gather, align, and alignat are designed to produce a structure whose width is the full line width. This means, for example, that one cannot readily add parentheses around the entire structure. But variants gathered, aligned, and alignedat are provided whose total width is the actual width of the contents; thus they can be used as a component in a containing expression.
In my test, the environment aligned worked.

Wonderful! The quote you so helpfully posted helps me understand why it doesn't work, as well as showing me why the substitute environment does. Fantastic. I'll give it a try when I have some time.
 
Worked just fine. Had to tweak it a hair to get the alignment what I wanted. Final working code:

Code:
\begin{tabbing}\qquad \= 11.\quad \= \hpsace{0.4\linewidth} \= 11.\quad \=
\kill

\>$\phantom{1}$1.\>
$\begin{aligned}[t]
f(x)&=2x+4\\
a&=3\\
L&=10\\
\varepsilon&=0.01
\end{aligned}$
\>$\phantom{1}$5.\>
$\begin{aligned}[t]
f(x)&=6x-10\\
a&=-2\\
L&=-22\\
\varepsilon&=0.4
\end{aligned}$\\
\end{tabbing}

Thanks much!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
840