All New Cells Every Seven (Nine?) Years?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Wally
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cells Years
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the concept of cellular turnover in the human body and its implications for personal identity over time. It highlights that while many cells in the body are regularly replaced, some, like brain cells, are not. The idea that a person is entirely different on a cellular level every seven to nine years is considered an exaggeration. Although the mass of replaced cells suggests a new physical self, certain cells persist throughout life, maintaining continuity. The conversation references Bill Bryson's work, which notes that while brain cells last a lifetime, their components are continuously renewed, creating a dynamic equilibrium within cells. This leads to the analogy of a bucket of water, where new water is added, but a small percentage of the old remains, emphasizing that while cellular components may change, some original elements persist.
Wally
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Greetings!

I have read/heard from various sources that none of the cells in my (or any other human's) body now are the same as they were seven (At least one source said nine years) years ago. I remember reading from one source that some cells don't "die" but all of the separate parts are replaced, so that the entire cell really is different, without having died.

I remember being told that some memory cells are never replaced, and some brain cells are replaced after fifty years. Would they have changed all of their parts without dying, as mentioned above, in essence making them new cells?

Am I a completely different person than I was less than a decade ago on the cellular scale? Thanks in advance.
 
Biology news on Phys.org
Good question. I am pretty sure that the "you are a completely different person every 7 years" is just a colloquial exageration which is picking up on the average lifespan of our bodies cells. It is true that some cells are never replaced, like the brain cells, while cells in the stomach lining are replaced very very regularly (due to the extreme conditions).

So I would guess that you are, by mass of turned over cells, a completely new person. But in reality you have some consistent cells which never die, and some which are replaced regularly, so no, you maintain a constant part of yourself for most if not all of your life.

(as an educated guess)
 
Thank you for replying!

In Bill Bryson's A Short History of Nearly Everything (Page 373 of the hardcover edition, Part V "Life Itself", 24 "Cells") he says: "Brain cells last as long as you do. You are issued a hundred billion or so at birth, and that is all you are ever going to get. ... The good news is that the individual components of your brain cells are constantly renewed so that, as with the liver cells, no part of them is actually likely to be more than about a month old. Indeed, it has been suggested that there isn't a single bit of any of us - not so much as a stray molecule - that was part of us nine years ago."

Is it true that "the individual components of your brain cells are constantly renewed", and all other cells?
 
Well that does also make a lot of sense. Virtually every part of the cell is an equilibrium of sorts, with things being broken down, new copies being recreated and the rate of the two being the determining factor for how much is present.

I've never really thought about that part of that claim.

But since it is an equilibriated system, it would be like pouring fresh water into a bucket full of dirty water. Eventually it would look like a clean bucket of water, but there will always be the smallest percentage of dirty water in there.
 
Deadly cattle screwworm parasite found in US patient. What to know. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2025/08/25/new-world-screwworm-human-case/85813010007/ Exclusive: U.S. confirms nation's first travel-associated human screwworm case connected to Central American outbreak https://www.reuters.com/business/environment/us-confirms-nations-first-travel-associated-human-screwworm-case-connected-2025-08-25/...
Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S. According to articles in the Los Angeles Times, "Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S.", and "Kissing bugs bring deadly disease to California". LA Times requires a subscription. Related article -...
I am reading Nicholas Wade's book A Troublesome Inheritance. Please let's not make this thread a critique about the merits or demerits of the book. This thread is my attempt to understanding the evidence that Natural Selection in the human genome was recent and regional. On Page 103 of A Troublesome Inheritance, Wade writes the following: "The regional nature of selection was first made evident in a genomewide scan undertaken by Jonathan Pritchard, a population geneticist at the...
Back
Top