Alpha & Proton Decay: Explaining Unequal Rates

majid313mirzae
Messages
13
Reaction score
1
All nuclei with A > 210 are alpha emitters, yet very few emit protons spontaneously.
Yet both decays lower the Coulomb energy of the nucleus. Why is
proton decay not more common?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Look at the binding energy curve.
 
majid313mirzae said:
All nuclei with A > 210 are alpha emitters, yet very few emit protons spontaneously.
Yet both decays lower the Coulomb energy of the nucleus. Why is
proton decay not more common?

Some of these nuclei undergo beta decay, not alpha.
 
The binding energy of alpha particles means more energy available to make the decay happen -- it happens by quantum-mechanical tunneling.

I could dig up the alpha decay rate if anyone is interested - it also works for protons.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...

Similar threads

Back
Top